Quote: The proof was all over the place, 300,000 Iraqi's dead from chemical weapons thanks to Saddam should be proof enough for anyone with common sense.
Tell me where I said Saddam didn't have these weapons?
Come on. You've exhibited poor reading comprehension in the past, but damn man, I only wrote 3 sentences. Certainly that's not hard to follow.
Quote: But clearly, as sigma's post shows, there will be some people in this country that are so blinded by their hatred of Bush ...
Hatred of Bush?
Get off your high horse. I voted for him as Governor, as President, and right now am 50/50 on November.
I was simply presenting what some people thought. It's called learning. I can sit here and effectively argue circles around you all day from any side of any point of any topic. Did I ever say that was my opinion?
Nope. Don't think so.
Still gotta work on that reading comprehension, Nick.
Quote: ...that even now that we HAVE THE PROOF, they will still try to twist their own words, twist the definition of a WMD to not include sarin nerve gas, etc...
Proof?
Show me where Sarin is considered a WMD?
A chemical weapon, yes. But is it a Weapon of Mass Destruction? I was under the belief that it was not considered to be a WMD because of the concentrations needed to kill.
Now that you've proved it to be a WMD, now you need to prove it was Saddam's WMD...
Show me how old this bomb was. Was it a new bomb? Or was it a remnant from the Iraq/Iran Wars?
If it was a new bomb, was it at least 2 years old, placing it made under Saddam's rule?
If it was at least 2 years old, who made it? Was it made under a government-sanctioned program, or just some guy in the back of his tent working for Al Qaeda or any other group?
It's calling thinking. Using your head and logic rather than 100% reactionary thinking. I tend to think things through before making blind reactions based on what I want to be true.
Quote: Umm, i think we just proved them correct? If I am reading the like I posted to be correct, we HAVE FOUND these WMD's that Iraq never had???
And it would be great if they are correct.
But, at this point in time it doesn't matter.
It's already known that some things were over-exaggerated or mis-represented by someone at some point in the chain (probably not Bush) to get us there.
But, who cares, what's done is done.
I've always supported going into Iraq so this doesn't change my feelings one way or the other.
