Originally posted by spgoode:
If you read above you'll see that I stated that Kay stated there was no evidence. You are just restating what I restated.

Wrong. He SPECIFICALLY stated that evidence pointing towards programs and development HAD BEEN DESTROYED.

That's a HUGE difference than having NO evidence whatsoever.

Reading comprehension is sorely needed here.


Originally posted by spgoode:
Again I am puzzled why you would think I would not respond when I have shot down every point you've made like Dick Cheney in a duck blind.

I so love a delusional mind, especially when I've still had ZERO (0) questions that I've posed answered in any form by you. It's all dodge and hustle on your part. Go back and simply answer the questions I've posed. That's all I'm asking here. Nothing sinister.

Originally posted by spgoode:
And again you'll have to excuse me if I don't take your word as gold and ask that you supply a pertinent source for your information.

It's obvious that you are satisfied with headline news and the mainstream media as your main source of information. I prefer...other sources, shall we say, in combination with what the media s**ts out their bowels most of the time and misrepresents and in addition to a number of foreign articles and industry pubs (Jane's being one of them).

Again, if you don't consider sworn public testimony from Kay himself on the matter as pertinent, I'm pretty much done with your lack of resoning here.

Originally posted by spgoode:
The articles you cited earlier, about the trailers being cleaned and what they contained, use information from administration press releases and I regard this info as highly dubious.


Other experts aside from US ones had access to some of the trailers and offered the same conclusions. I'm looking for these. I think they were British, IIRC.



Originally posted by spgoode:
Here's one! It's an abstract from a NY Times article stating that some experts disagree with the administration. You have to pay to see the entire article.

ABSTRACT - American and British intelligence analysts with direct access to evidence dispute claims that trailers found in Iraq in Apr and May were part of biological warfare program, interviews; say they were more likely intended for other purposes; charge evaluation process was damaged by rush to judgment; Central Intelligence Agency reaffirms stand (M)

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20E1EFD3C5D0C748CDDAF0894DB404482



Again, just because a couple of lab rats couldn't figure out how to "cook" biotoxins without a multi-million dollar chemistry set doesn't mean a number of other veteran intel analysts (CIA and otherwise) didn't see that having fermentation units and the like in those trailers and the additions of a few cheap items like a washbasin and plastic sheeting could serve just fine.

Again, READ Kay's report. There's enough in there to chew over for a while. I'll see if I can get some pulls from Jane's this weekend and grab some other material as well. I'm still digging for the British piece on the trailers as well.

JaTo e-Tough Guy Missouri City, TX 99 Contour SVT #143/2760 00 Corvette Coupe