Originally posted by JaTo:
Originally posted by spgoode:
However I will concede that we can't be sure they were not used for making biological weapons. Here's a more recent article where David Kay sounds pretty convinced that they were not.

"And Vice President Dick Cheney cited discovery of two semi-trailers in Iraq as "conclusive evidence" that Iraq "did, in fact, have programs for weapons of mass destruction."
Here's David Kay on that canard: "When you look at those two trailers, while they had capabilities in many areas, their actual intended use was not for the production of biological weapons."

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36854




I was waiting for you to take this approach. Here's Kay's testimony to the CIA. EDIT: Sorry, House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

Read it, you might learn something other that what you pick up from CNBC:

http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html

Check the middle for the discussion on the mobile labs. Kay's final words on this topic were:

"That said, nothing we have discovered rules out their potential use in BW production."



We both know that over the last year David Kay's opinion on Iraq's WMD's evolved from utter certainty that he would find them to his belief that there is no evidence.
You think that him saying seven months ago that we can't rule out their "potential use in BW production" is a good argument to support your position? The artlicle I quoted was three months after his testimony in fromt of the intelligence committee. Not long, but this was a very fluid issue.
The articles you cited earlier, about the trailers being cleaned and what they contained, use information from administration press releases and I regard this info as highly dubious.

Dueling Duratecs '95 SE V6 MTX 0 Mods '04 Mazda6 S Wagon '03 Kawasaki Z1000 But thus do I counsel you, my friends: distrust all in whom the impulse to punish is powerful! Friedrich Nietzsche