Originally posted by HITMANinMI: To expand on my eariler quote, about the US does deserve another attack.
We have so far killed over 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilans, most hated Saddam and had nothing to do with his gang. We have destroyed the entire country of Iraq.
We did all that to get Saddam "weapons" and to prevent him from attacking the US.
So far no weapons have been found, and few people think they ever will.
So basically everyone who disagrees with what I said thinks its okay for us to be terrorists and kill over 100k people, but it isnt okay for people to come here and carry out a terrorists attack.
The problem with some people here is they dont care if innocent people die in Iraq, but if they die here they do care.
They care only what happens in their homeland and care about no other country and what the World thinks of us.
We get what we dish out, we kill hundreds of thousands for no reason, we can expect it to happen here to.
I do fell sorry that people do die in attacks, but I truly believe that we get what we deserve.
Also folks something else to think about, could we be forced to leave the UN because of Bushs lies?
Bush has really messed up the World.
I feel sorry for the future of America.
First- Go read up on the composition of the UN, its history, and its structure. Pay special attention to the parts about "Permanent Member of the Security Council" and "Veto Power".
Second, the first and foremost duty of any government is to protect its citizens... that's why they're in power. Despite what liberal filth you may spew regarding conspiracy theories, flawed intelligence, or the like, we have no *good* way to protect against terrorism. Saddam, on the other hand, had a perfectly simple way of protecting his citizens-- stop parading himself like he had WMDs (which he most certainly did, with them or without), let the inspectors back into the country with full, unrestricted access, and solve the problems politically. Instead, he acted like a typical dictator-- like a jackass-- and he got burned on it when America refused to back down like he apparently thought they would. If terrorism is "our fault", as you so childishly put it, then the war is his fault. And even though terrorism is not our fault, the war can still be squarely blamed on his utter lack of diplomacy, cooperation, and simple common sense.
