I am not here to brag or to put down others. However, he must pussy foot his car to only be running 6.6 second 0-60s and 14.7 1/4 miles with a 100 shot! A 50 shot will get the same results if driven right. In the right hands, his car's 0-60 should be at least 6.1 and his 1/4 mile should be at least 14.0-14.2 if not better. Where do I get off saying this? I use to have a ZEX kit, set on the 75 shot, on my Cougar. Right off the bat, I have a 25 shot disadvantage and 30 hp less NA. So, with my 55hp disadvantage, how did I manage an average 0-60 of 6.2 and an average 1/4 mile of 14.3? These are my averages! My best 0-60 was 5.9 and my best 1/4 mile was 14.1. Now, before you start asking for timeslips, I must note that these numbers where measured with a G-Tech. Still, how where his times measured? If he measured his 0-60 with a stopwatch, well then that explains everything. But, chances are that he used a G-Tech. Either way ... his numbers are not a true reflection of what a 100 shot system could do on a car already putting down 160-170hp to the ground NA. Not criticism, just an obviously overlook observation
