Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#94336 04/25/01 12:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
R
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
R
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
from what I understand, they lowered the N2O shot and didn't launch it as hard


It's all about balance.

bcphillips@peoplepc.com
#94337 04/25/01 05:19 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally posted by fastcougar:
I must note that these numbers where measured with a G-Tech.


Well then. My stock SVT pulled 14.8's on a G-tech in an average of 6 runs (both directions) Know what that means. Nada to anyone else but me an and my future mods...

Great tool for tuning you car. Worthless for comparing to others.

Guess what. Running at a track or dynoing is pretty much the same way. Unless the car you are comparing is tested at the same location...


2000 SVT #674 - Check it out!

Whoever coined the phrase; "If it ain't broke; don't fix it" ~ Just doesn't get it...
#94338 04/25/01 01:47 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 434
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 434
This is true, but I was not comparing my car to his ... I was simply stating that with that much HP and TQ, he should be getting better numbers. I was simply stating what I have done, to show that with less HP and TQ, I have gotten better numbers. Don't get all bent out of shape! The ONLY WAY to compare two cars is head to head on the 1/4 mile ... best out of 5 runs would be nice due to mistakes that can be made, but that is neither here nor there.

[This message has been edited by fastcougar (edited April 25, 2001).]


Best Regards,

Trevor Cole

New Edge Cougar Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5