|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 171
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 171 |
2000 SVT Black #1400 of 2150
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,587
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,587 |
I will say alpine because I am programmed to, and because I want them. I have a T757 V12 and have nothing but good things to say about them. I also know these new models are much improved internally over the already great previous gen V12s. I will say that the RFs look goofy (think cheap) and if you are concerned at all with the install looking nice, the V12 is the way to go. But I am an Alpine fan (HUs, amps, not speakers or subwoofer, you can do much better in those two departments) so my opinion is just a little biased 
1996 Contour "Mean Green" (99-02) 2002 Malibu Blue Focus ZX5 - something to hold the PB 15...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 470
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 470 |
I agree with Honkey IMHO. I mean the rockfords do look "off", and also from what i read, i think the alpines have more potential. As for HU, i just finished installing a Double Din CD, Minidisc into my g/f's focus. Love it already! 
Give me more beer and CEG before i get depressed!
AIM/AOL: DBZ Jr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,587
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,587 |
AH ha! I coudn't figure out what CD player you bought. I thought maybe it was the DDIN size face one that fits the DIN hole (I will own that HU, oh yes I will!) Now it all makes sense! Sweet! I want to see some pics of this stuff man. Oh yeah, the new V12s don't draw nearly as much power as the old ones, something like half the amps of last years, espescially the digital amps. They are amazing 
1996 Contour "Mean Green" (99-02) 2002 Malibu Blue Focus ZX5 - something to hold the PB 15...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032 |
Personally, I wouldn't consider Alpine or RF amps as the bang for the buck is low on either of them. My personal alternative would be a US Acoustics USX-2080 for $80 and $220 in my pocket for more stuff. But, with a gun to my head I'd go with the Alpine amp. The RF's amp output is lower indicated by the 10GA power requirement (8GA for the Alpine) and rating at 14.4V (USX is 12.9V, I think the Alpine is rated at 12.5V). I think the RF amp also has the lowest S/N ratio. Plus, it's ugly and is available at Best Buy!
1999 SVT #900/2760 Born on 1-20-99 Silver Frost/Midnight Blue A few aesthetic and audio mods
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142 |
Alpine out of the choices.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 470
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 470 |
Dave just gave an answer.. Everyone should just shut up and not argue, because he will fry your brains with his knowledge 
Give me more beer and CEG before i get depressed!
AIM/AOL: DBZ Jr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950 |
I like the RF. I have one right now but I have owned a few RF amps in the past and they've handled everything I've dished out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032 |
The older RF amps were much better than their current line-up. They were very underrated, better S/N ratio, etc...
RF has just gone "mainstream" and sells average amps for premium prices based on their reputation built on their above average older stuff.
1999 SVT #900/2760 Born on 1-20-99 Silver Frost/Midnight Blue A few aesthetic and audio mods
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 91
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 91 |
RF only sells average amps?? Uhmmmm...how do you figure! What kind of an average guy goes and buys a bd1500.1 for some occasional easy listening? Rockford is still as good as they have every been, maybe even better. They are expensive but you get what you pay for. Go buy a rockford amp and then judge it.
Joel Falkenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|