|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Derk2000: 1. so with ~35% of the fuel going towards the secondary valve, do you think that's enough during high RPMs?
2. That's not going to create strange combustion patterns within the chamber?
1. 100% of the fuel is still going to the chamber. It is just getting better mixed with the air charge.
2. As opposed to 100% going to only one valve? One valve of lower velocity air.
Better fuel atomization makes for a more efficient engine. I definitely have much better fuel atomization.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|