Exactly..
If there are no WMD in Iraq (and I am not sure theyre arent) it seems EVERYONE including Hans Blix, John Kerry, the UN. etc. that had access to the same intel, the same weapons declarations by Sadam himself, are NOW acting as if they were never convinced of a threat....that regime change was all Bushes "sceem" (and not infact OFFICIAL policy adopted by Clinton). Pathetic.
If UN believed therere were no WMD, why pass resolutions, why sanction?...Slowing starving people..wait, the UN did not KNOW they were starving people because they were doing "oil for food" (NOT KNOWING OR IGNORIN the fact that it was really a Sadam sceam to overcharge for food & give him kickbacks to the tune of some 5.5 BILLION + dollars!!)...money used in part to pay families of suicide bombers. Guess we would not have figured out THAT without invading. Other stuff we will find out (and you can qoute me here) is France's and Russia's duplicity in this, obtaining cheap oil, selling arms, being key trading partners with, in exchange for looking the other way of the oil/food scams and providing inside info as to the U.N. discussions and probably the weapons inspector site visit schedule (which we know they had). And Dems wanted to trust OUR fate to the UN security councel. I want to barf everytime Kerry talks about how he would have handled Iraq, got the UN involved (as if we did not try). His flip-flopping, backpedling, vote for then against...ZERO leadership character!
WMD or no WMD, the main reason for going to Iraq is as I described in my eariler post. Freeing a couple million persons from Sadam feels pretty good too. Ohh..did you guys see the pics of the bronze GWB statue errected in Bagdad made from the melted down Sadam statue by an Iraqi artist. ...Not a Kerry statue anywhere.
