|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220 |
Quote:
I would suggest that there are a number of health risks not normally present with heterosexual activities. And these are NOT what we normally call sexually transmitted diseases. Among these are:
Well, what you said is all fine and dandy, except for that over 20% of heterosexual couples include anal sex in their "heterosexual activities".
Assuming that there's 100 million couples in the US, that's over 20 million people that practice anal (or "homosexual") sexual activity. A number that far outweighs the number of homosexuals in the US.
Is it more unsafe/dirty to have anal sex? Definently. But it is far too large of a generalization to claim that "homosexual sex" is more dangerous than "hetersexual sex" on the basis of the healthiness of anal sex alone, because heterosexuals practice it in far greater numbers than homosexuals do.
And of course, when you bring up the topic of the healthiness of anal sex being an issue with homosexuality you totally remove lesbianism from the equation, as they don't practice it in any greater numbers than heterosexuals do.
2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX
Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
|
|
|
|
|
|