Originally posted by Beowulf:
Quote:

The point is this: if homosexuality isn't genetic, then marriage is out of the question. The government should not allow marriage based on a deviant behavior.



Deviant? Deviant? DEVIANT?

Says who? You? If you found that splitting your Oreo's in half was deviant, does that mean anything?




Yes, DEVIANT!

Originally posted by dictionary.com:
de·vi·ant
adj.
Differing from a norm or from the accepted standards of a society.

n.
One that differs from a norm, especially a person whose behavior and attitudes differ from accepted social standards.



Originally posted by Beowulf:
Where in the human genome does it specify man + woman = marriage?



That's a good question (even though it was loaded). I don't know, but men and women have been getting married for millenia, in all societies. I wonder why that is?

Originally posted by Beowulf:
If we want to look at this from a physological standpoint, the human male is genetically equipped for bigamy and polyandry. Scientific studies have shown that male ejaculatory fluid aggresively creates a environment detrimental to any other semen in the female body. Or let us discuss that the uncircumcised male penis acts as a suctioning devide to remove any already deposited semen from the female. of course, this is not to fit some moral code, this is just to propigate the males's DNA to another generation.

Shall we move on how women are equiped by nature to handle multiple male parters in a short time so as to increase the chances of impregnation?



All your points lend themselves to heterosexuality. Interesting.....

Chad Purser 2002 Lexus IS300 5-speed manual formerly '98 Silver SVT