Originally posted by cpurser:

2) One of the articles I listed simply states that the study linking genetics to homosexuality was wrong, and it gave facts supporting the article. There was no bias to it. Since homosexuality is NOT genetic, then the gay activists have no basis for marriage.



right, and i can link you to ANOTHER article that states that homosexuality IS genetic. the point is that you can't make any positive conclusions, but from common sense, its pretty obvious that there are not JUST social factors involved in the homo/hetero sexuality of someone. and, assuming homosexuality is not genetic, which is HIGHLY doubtful, why do gay activists have no basis for marriage? you guys against gay marriage are all over the place.

1998 T-Red CSVT 3.0L