|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,195
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,195 |
Originally posted by CarpePoon:
Originally posted by moxnix:
If you are going to marry her at least get a Real Doll to show that you care. If you marry a regular blow up doll she will think you only want her for sex but if you get a Real Doll she will know that you only want the best for her.
I'll just assume that you "stumbled" onto this site through a series of popups. blow up dolls are just one step shy of necrophilia
I have an old issue of "Hustler" at home w/ a quite lengthy article on these dolls...they have excellent resale value (kinda disturbing  )
1999 Sportage 4x4...don't go there, it was free
....______o_o
.../_l l__\____\
..|--l l__----[]\|/[]
.....................oo
=( )_)----( )_)--)_)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,307
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,307 |
Originally posted by 96_Concept_GL:
Come on... I want my dog to have medical insurance, so I'll marry my dog. It IS and always has been a MORAL issue.
Whose morals? Certainly not mine, nor 95% of the people I know. Dogs are also not human. But, there IS pet health insurance. So, technically, it's easier for you to get health coverage for your pet than it is your gay lover whom you've been living with for 20 years.
Originally posted by 96_Concept_GL:
In a nation founded on religion, the institution of marriage is reserved and sworn to "under God". Why not allow polygamy?
It's allowed in Utah. Second of all, there is a separation of Church and State. Third of all, I will never be married "under god," as I'm NOT Catholic. I guess that means I shouldn't be married according to you? Come on out to MA and tell me that directly. In fact, tell it to ANYONE who's not Christian.
Originally posted by 96_Concept_GL:
I'm not condemning or condoning homosexuality, but if this whole thing boils down to wanting benfits and tax deductions it's straight BS.
How old are you? Do you live on your own? Have you ever tried to get health benefits? It would seem you're young, still live at home, and don't need the health bennies. Put yourself in the other pair of shoes- imagine having your government tell you that you cannot marry the person you've been living with for 20 years, simply because you're the same sex, while your friends have been married 3 or 4 times each to people for less than 2 years "just because it was the right thing to do." Hardly seems fair when you love someone with all your heart, and want to have the ability to marry them and make that commitment, but cannot, doesn't it? You're not condemning gays, you're right... you're condemning EVERYONE who isn't straight and fertile.
Originally posted by 96_Concept_GL:
So people don't stay married, that's their business. The only reason the gay populus wants marriage rights is because they were told they couldn't have them. Family consists of a liniage. Where is that in the dropping of it through same sex marriage. I'm sorry, call me whatever you want, but I know that I cannot support this.
Family consists of lineage? Ok. Try this one... what if either the male or female in a straight relationship is sterile. They cannot reproduce. So, that means they can never be or have a family, right? That's your argument. So, since they can't reproduce, they shouldn't be able to get married, I see. Nice line of thinking. I emplore you to go to a fertility clinic and tell EVERYONE in the waiting room that exact paragraph. Word of advice- get out before you're at least beaten to death. If I was in a car accident, and lost my testicles due to them being crushed, and could never have children, and you hit me with that sentence, I would beat you to within an inch of your life.
And, the "gay populus" as you put it wants marriage rights because that's exactly what they are- RIGHTS, HUMAN F*CKING RIGHTS. The goverment is telling them that they're less than human because they're not hetero. Might as well tell a Black couple they can't be married because they're Black... why not stop there? Why not make marriage only available to the upper 1%? Why limit it to race, religion, or sexual orientation? Why not just go for income as well? It's just as arbitrary a point to deny someone the RIGHT to marriage as any other.
1998 SVT Contour Silver Frost for sale in Classifieds.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,100
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,100 |
Originally posted by CarpePoon:
I'll just assume that you "stumbled" onto this site through a series of popups. blow up dolls are just one step shy of necrophilia
I don't think they use Pop up ads  They are not blow up dolls. Check out the site and you will find out that they are even better than the blow up dolls that you have  
Beaten - 2003 MazdaSpeed Protege 29K <- broken hearted
Daily/Weekend Beater - 1990 miata 138K - AutoX every weekend = Adult driven on weekends
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,100
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,100 |
Originally posted by SVZETEC:
I have an old issue of "Hustler" at home w/ a quite lengthy article on these dolls...they have excellent resale value (kinda disturbing )
 I guess I should have bought one of them instead of a contour.
Beaten - 2003 MazdaSpeed Protege 29K <- broken hearted
Daily/Weekend Beater - 1990 miata 138K - AutoX every weekend = Adult driven on weekends
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,695
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,695 |
Separation of church and state - try to find it in the constitution.
04 Subaru WRX "Eurosport bling bling fast and furious tokyo drift"
"They have diarrhea of the mouth, and constipation of thought"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,667
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,667 |
Originally posted by bishop375:
Originally posted by 96_Concept_GL:
Why not allow polygamy?
It's allowed in Utah.
Are you sure about that?? I didn't think it was.
And 7999- my grandma had Cushings disease- its not a fun disease at all.
I agree that the healthcare system is f'ed up, and a MAJOR overhaul is imminent, if you want my opinion. But the government is cutting in on the payments to the doctors by pharma companies as unethical, and a lot of that is starting to go away.
But thats another debate for another thread.
Diesel owns you
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076 |
Originally posted by moxnix:
Originally posted by CarpePoon:
I'll just assume that you "stumbled" onto this site through a series of popups. blow up dolls are just one step shy of necrophilia
I don't think they use Pop up ads They are not blow up dolls. Check out the site and you will find out that they are even better than the blow up dolls that you have
you TOTALLY missed my point.  And my s/n is carpepoon, not carpesilicone 
2000 SVT Black/Tan #1633/2150 (a few mods)
Alpine: CDA-9835, MRV-F540, MRD-M550
PG: TANTRUM-X 6.5 COMP all around.
Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas.
CEL currently: Off
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678 |
Originally posted by Dan Nixon:
If one state approves gay marriage and the couple moves to a state without GM then the state is forced to either reciprocate (which is not fair to the citizens of that state) or refuse (which is not fair to the couple). So this amendment is REALLY about protecting states rights every bit as much as it is critisized for being AGAINST states rights.
So it would be more fair to gay people to completely ban them from getting married on US soil? How would a constitutional amendment give states more rights when it completely usurps their power to decide this issue for themselves?
Why not let the states decide (a) whether they want to permit gays to marry within their borders and (b) whether they want to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere?
Wouldn't this be most fair for gay people?
I thought the republicans were the party in favor of states rights and decreasing the power of the national government?. A constitutional amendment seems like a major national power-grab to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678 |
Originally posted by 96_Concept_GL:
...In a nation founded on religion, the institution of marriage is reserved and sworn to "under God".
Umm... what nation would that be?
Obviously if you have ever read through our constitution, you would know that the United States was without a doubt NOT "founded on religion".
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,195
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,195 |
Originally posted by moxnix:
Originally posted by SVZETEC:
I have an old issue of "Hustler" at home w/ a quite lengthy article on these dolls...they have excellent resale value (kinda disturbing )
I guess I should have bought one of them instead of a contour.
1999 Sportage 4x4...don't go there, it was free
....______o_o
.../_l l__\____\
..|--l l__----[]\|/[]
.....................oo
=( )_)----( )_)--)_)
|
|
|
|
|
