|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Originally posted by warmonger: Originally posted by TourDeForce: With the gutted pre-cats I do not notice any gains vs my car when I bought it, just a slight extra drone from the exhaust. I also do not have headers, and the car is quiet as stock with the Dynomax Super Turbo muffler at the rear & a straight through resonator in the mid section.
Originally posted by TourDeForce: That's what I said...
Last I heard, Drone was a type of noise. Therefore, saying " gutted precats aren't noisy" and " I have just a slight extra drone..." Doesn't seem to go together to me. Also, to further empahsize my point as to why I WANTED to clarify that: I deem "noisy" things to be items that are audible, but NOT pleasureable to listen to. e.g. a rumbling v8 exhaust sounds good, a farty-sounding honda with drone and rasp sounds "NOISY" even when the v8 might technically be louder.
THEREFORE: Drone is not desired, does not sound good and is therefore "Noisy" to me and probably most people.
Since this is such a subjective topic, I felt that your statements were in direct contradiction to each other.....and felt the need to 'add to it'.
I haven't heard one SVT with gutted precats increasing in drone as long as a resonator is retained. They sound a bit more rumbly, not really louder but just a tone change to the exhaust, and they sound pretty good overall I must say.
Right. I was thinking he meant volume, when he may have actually meant "noise" by your definition - which, strictly speaking, I consider correct.
As a parent of two, noise has evolved to mean something (noise or not) of significant enough volume so as to alter my mood - or at least irritate my typically placid demeaner.
Your clarification was a valid & justified point. Thank you.
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
|
|