Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
#859814 02/03/04 02:00 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9,196
K
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
K
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9,196
Quote:

Problem is there are too many people around here who think it's a drag-racing trans and beat the crap out of it




"THE" most accurate statement uttered here in the CEG, ever I have almost 48K on my car and haven't had ANY trans problems, for that matter, I haven't had any problems with my car at all! I think the other problem is most people have never driven a stick and this was their first one, not good. I'm not saying its the best tranny in the world because its not and a factory installed Quaife/Torsen would've been smart too, but its not made for 5K+ launches, its just not and until people get that through their heads, they're going to continue to blow up, period.


As far as a Cavalier w/ an Ecotec beating a CSVT, no way in hell. For this one, I'm from Missouri...show me


"THEE" Roger R USMondeo@aol.com 2005 Crossfire Limited coupe' -FOR SALE @buyout price & I'll... -throw in my 93' Regal as winter car *Dragon Run 06'...Oct 12-15th* Puur-fection Auto Detailing Complete packages from $140.00
#859815 02/03/04 02:00 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
T
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
Well stated.


-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
#859816 02/03/04 05:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 191
G
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
G
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 191
Well you guys get too touchy...Of course I know that I will have to upgrade gas when I go F.I..DUH! But till then its 87 for me. Also I will independant this year so I will get about 3K to help with bills each quarter for school so I'll have plenty to go turbo. I know that the warranty doesnt cover that so really I'm not going to touch the engine at all for at least 20k which would be next year. And a base ecotec beating an SVT in the 1/4! You just have no idea about track racing obviously. A base cavy probably weight 700lbs less then the SVT. With no traction problems the 60' time will be won by the BASE cavy every time. My SVT 60' times sucked. I usally ran a 2.4 but sometimes a 2.3. Thats sucks in track terms. I've seen a few Cavy's run 2.1, 2.0 track time with o.k drivers. Just driving my car around I can already tell the 60' is way faster in cavy. I will admit that it would never hang in the top gears with the SVT but by the time the SVT gets going in the quarter its to late. Come-on SVT's are not unbeatable. And with a lighter car its much easier. I guess I'll find out in march when track season starts


99 CSVT****TRADED IN**** 98 CSVT *SHO Y-pipe *Magnaflow Exhaust *highflow cat *KKM intake *Rousch springs *ST200 Struts *19" Axis Sevens 2004 Blue Chevy Cavalier *Groundcontrol coilovers *debadged
#859817 02/03/04 05:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 660
0
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
0
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 660
Originally posted by green SVT:
And a base ecotec beating an SVT in the 1/4! You just have no idea about track racing obviously. A base cavy probably weight 700lbs less then the SVT. With no traction problems the 60' time will be won by the BASE cavy every time.




Well, I'll agree with Roger and tell you I don't buy that 1/4 mile time either. The trap speed seems a bit low for that time. Also, you're looking at MAYBE a 500-pound difference in weight if you're lucky (and even that number I think is generous.

I have no problem if you trade your car in; whatever blows your skirt up, I say. But don't fudge numbers because there are WAAAYYYYY too many people in here that are gonna fly the BS flag up the pole on ya.





2000 SVT Contour -- SOLD! New car coming soon... 1980 Triumph TR7 -- Needs a new home...
#859818 02/03/04 07:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 287
M
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
M
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 287
My 60' foot time when i went to the track bone stock was the best 2.2 and a few 2.3...also it depends on track as well..I dont have to worry now though...I should be easily in the 1.8ish range maybe better as i soon start modding my car more


04 Blue WRX -Rota Subzero's 17in gold,Cobb Tunning Stage 2 93 octane, tein springs, 3in -turboback with magnaflow muffler + 1 resonator 2 1/4 up-pipe Former owner of Conniethecontour 99 CSVT...My first love
#859819 02/03/04 08:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,757
L
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
L
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,757
Originally posted by green SVT:
My SVT 60' times sucked. I usally ran a 2.4 but sometimes a 2.3. Thats sucks in track terms. I've seen a few Cavy's run 2.1, 2.0 track time with o.k drivers.




If you want to rip up the quarter mile, you've got the wrong car!!

#859820 02/03/04 09:57 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
T
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
Originally posted by green SVT:
A base cavy probably weight 700lbs less then the SVT.




SVT = 3,126
Cadavalier Coupe = 2,617

509 Difference.


-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
#859821 02/03/04 11:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 660
0
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
0
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 660
Originally posted by todras:
Originally posted by green SVT:
A base cavy probably weight 700lbs less then the SVT.




SVT = 3,126
Cadavalier Coupe = 2,617

509 Difference.




Looks like I was pretty close...


2000 SVT Contour -- SOLD! New car coming soon... 1980 Triumph TR7 -- Needs a new home...
#859822 02/04/04 12:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 191
G
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
G
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 191
and your saying thats not alot of weight? 500 lbs!!!
Gimme a break Believe what you must but a low trap speed(i.e 84-87) isnt out of the question if you pull a better 60' time. Here some links believe it! and here is some cars that weight EVEN less with not much more H.P. Put two and two together
Acura RSX Type-S, 2002 04/02 FWD 2,775 168 0.88 15.0 133 $23,650
Acura RSX Type-S, 2002 12/02 FWD 2,775 172 0.82 16.1 142 $23,650
Acura TSX, 2004 08/03 FWD 3,230 179 0.84 15.7 131.2 $26,490
Dodge SRT-4, 2003 01/03 FWD 2,870 223 0.85 14.2 119 $19,995
Ford SVT Focus, 2002 04/02 FWD 2,750 150 0.85 15.8 116 $17,995
Ford SVT Focus, 2003 01/03 FWD 2,780 150 0.87 15.7 122 $17,480
Honda Civic Si, 2002 12/02 FWD 2,774 140 0.83 16.2 142 $19,440
Honda Civic Si, 2003 01/03 FWD 2,730 138 0.83 16.2 140 $19,000
Hyundai Tiburon GT V6, 2003 04/02 FWD 3,023 148 0.84 15.6 122 $18,399
Hyundai Tiburon V6, 2003 01/03 FWD 3,040 148 0.84 15.8 123 $18,849
Mazdaspeed Protegé, 2003 01/03 FWD 2,810 150 0.89 15.5 123 $19,980
Mazdaspeed Protegé, 2003 10/02 FWD 2,843 151 0.88 15.3 123 -
The last stock Ecotec Cavalier we tested ran to 60 mph in 8.3 seconds and loafed down the strip in 16 seconds flat at 85.6 mph(from sport compact..this ecotec being a LOADED Ls model weighs as much as an SVT)

http://www.j-body.org/forums/read.php?f=48&i=319&t=319
just scroll throught some of the posts lots of 15.2's 15.3 on stock eco's.

IN THE END through all my [censored] the modding ability of the cavalier is way higher than the CSVT. Of course this is like selling sand on the beach but oh well


99 CSVT****TRADED IN**** 98 CSVT *SHO Y-pipe *Magnaflow Exhaust *highflow cat *KKM intake *Rousch springs *ST200 Struts *19" Axis Sevens 2004 Blue Chevy Cavalier *Groundcontrol coilovers *debadged
#859823 02/04/04 04:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 660
0
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
0
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 660
All I said was it wasn't 700 pounds. And also, I read through every one of those mind-numbing posts on that j-body board and I still have yet to see anyone hit this supposed 15.2-15.3 time. Saw a bunch of supposedly stock guys running mid-15s and some even up in the 16s. Only cars I saw running low 15s were the intake/exhaust guys. So where are these BONE STOCK ecotecs knocking on the 14-second door?

And for you guys without the patience to weed through that mess on the j-body page, here's what "stueys2003" had to say...
I ran with like 5000 miles or so on my engine, I now passed 10 but i dont know about any track time in october in chicago. 16.5 with a auto no mods accept a fake @!#$ wai took the hose off the box and put a cone filter on the plastic bend. Now i have the same broak @!#$ air setup but i got the upper and lower engine mounts, a flowmaster 40 series muffler, autotrans interceptor, and a lil toy called a g-box. makes it run richer!!!

A g-box??!??!?!?! What in the hell is this crap? Hahahahahaha... somebody over there was pimping a Pace Setter exhaust setup as well. I didn't know they still sold those things. I think they used to have those in the Sears Christmas catalog next to the louvers...


2000 SVT Contour -- SOLD! New car coming soon... 1980 Triumph TR7 -- Needs a new home...
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  WorldTour_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5