Yeah, looks are opinion,, but if you see the evo look as the future, than I hope the future never comes.... I don't think abstractism works well for cars, which the evo is sorta a picasso of cars,, it's lines don't flow well at all. The euros look bad, the trunk and wing look bad, the hood looks bad (though functionality is good), the front bumper looks bad, and the interior, especially the back seat doesn't spark my interest. I'd like to know what you think looks good about them, tim man. As said before, performance is great, I can't fault the evo or srt4 on that, but the evo looks like crap, the srt4 has some good ideas, but still doesn't look GOOD. It's not that I wouldn't drive either one, it's just that you can't justify calling either car sexy. Now, the srt4 has some hope, I've seen heavily modified (exterior) srt4's in person and they can look good.. Haven't seen a modified evo, though did see a modified lancer (had evo style hood, and some other things) that looked even worse modified than stock,,, and it was supposed to be the good looking lancer I reckon this is gonna be one of the times where we agree to disagree,,, but atleast I'll be disagreeing on the subject and saving myself from ever owning a truly ugly car (my car isn't truly ugly, so don't even mention it) ....


98.5 SVT 91 Escort GT (almost sold) 96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve) FS: SVT rear sway bar WTB: Very cheap beater CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15