|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,627
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,627 |
I ran a 15.7@86mph stock. I have since bought and sold my intake and I have lighter rims a stage 1 clutch lightened flywheel plugs and wires and some other stuff I think I loss track of crap I put on that thing
Trollin the boards as of 9/23
Originally posted by GS474:
stock hp is never enough
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 259
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 259 |
as stated in my signature my best is 16.25 at 85.42, and that's stock ATX 
ATX -Originally posted by bnoon:
Get enough HP/TQ and some traction and you can race a ricer one handed while sipping a slirpy. Nothing wrong with that. 
<font class="post">
16.251@85.42 mph
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 49
New CEG\'er
|
|
New CEG\'er
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 49 |
I ran a 15.2 @89mph at Milan Dragway, i was impressed, due to a 92 degree hot and humid day, and a rutted out launch pad....but i guess i helped myself along, with taking the air box off and putting a bag of ice on my UIM in the lineup. despite that good time for a stock by comparison to C&D Motortrend, and Ford, who if i can recall spec'd the 1/4 to take about 15.7.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 670
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 670 |
Ford must of had 400lbs of ballast in the car because I've run 15.7.
-R-
I'm a Karate Man. Karate men..bruise on the inside.
"The difference between oversteer and understeer: oversteer is when the passengers are scared, understeer is when the driver is scared." -Driver Unknown
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165 |
They need to come out with a car that has a factory nitrous system.
Tim
'01 GTP: 3.3" pulley, Headers, 3" Exhaust, Straight Pipe, Intense Air to Water Intercooler. Pictures
Old Ride: 95 Mystique LS V6 ATX: Pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
Originally posted by Tim:
They need to come out with a car that has a factory nitrous system.
Tim
You mean like this?:::
http://www.nzmustang.com/NewMustangs/2003shelbyeleanor.htm
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Kung Fu Joe:
Ford must of had 400lbs of ballast in the car because I've run 15.7.
Actually they used a compuer model using maximum vehicle curb weight & a 300lb ballast and shifting at the 6700rpm soft limiter.
Magazines posted between 15.2-15.4 at 91mph & 143-144mph top speed.
Though to my knowledge no 00 SVT was ever "magazine" tested. 
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Magazines posted between 15.2-15.4 at 91mph & 143-144mph top speed.
Though to my knowledge no 00 SVT was ever "magazine" tested.
Why? They already tested the best.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by warmonger:
Why? They already tested the best.
Oh yeah!!!
I'll race you right now!!! 
Uh huh... That's what I thought... 
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
