Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#830294 01/07/04 06:28 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
So with that thinking, our total 2.5L engine size is really *does the math in the head* 30.0L engines!!! Whoa!! We have big engines!!!! Actually the liter size is the total of all the pistons bore/stroke, like you described. So, really, each pistons is approx. .4XXL

And I remember this discussion before I believe either on the onld Delphi SHOtimes board or SHOforum.com that the 3.4L V8 and the 2.5L Duratec share the same bore/stroke. In essence (IIRC) the 3.4L is a 2.5L with two cylinders added to it (minuse the intake tract, etc)

Originally posted by Obsidian:
piston size isn't the same though. the meaning of 2.5, 2.0, 3.8, or 3.4 (just throwing out numbers) isn't the size of the total displacement of the engine or anything like that, it's the size of EACH individually cylinder. So unless I've been taught wrong all this time, there is no way a 3.4 liter piston fit into a 2.5 cylinder.

But to tell you the truth... I can't remember how they get that number... I have ideas but I'm not so sure... can any clear things up for me?




Ryan Trollin!
#830295 01/07/04 09:26 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
J
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
J
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
Quote:

the meaning of 2.5, 2.0, 3.8, or 3.4 (just throwing out numbers) isn't the size of the total displacement of the engine or anything like that, it's the size of EACH individually cylinder. So unless I've been taught wrong all this time, there is no way a 3.4 liter piston fit into a 2.5 cylinder.




That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever heard! You, my friend, have been taught wrong this whole time. wow!


99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998 Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract? I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5