Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
S
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
Originally posted by akrump47:
Wait a sec ... you don't have the money for a 3L but you can afford forged rods, pistons and custom crank and bearings?

I call BS!




Check out my reply to DemonSVT and then make your call.

Making a decsion based on inacurate information only results in a flawed decision.


Former, now returned CEG'er! 95SE MTX, (AKA "The Road Rat"). Stock except for:TH fix, B.A.T. big brake kit, tranny cocktail and lots of re-insulated wiring! May yet be a 3.0! "Speed doesn't kill, stupidity does!"
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
S
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
It appears the links in my previous post aren't working,so for the Clevite High performance engine bearing info go to:

Clevite High performance engine Bearings

For the catalytic converter thread go to:

http://www.contour.org/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=trouble&Number=465322&page=&view=&sb=5&o=&fpart=all&vc=1


Former, now returned CEG'er! 95SE MTX, (AKA "The Road Rat"). Stock except for:TH fix, B.A.T. big brake kit, tranny cocktail and lots of re-insulated wiring! May yet be a 3.0! "Speed doesn't kill, stupidity does!"
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475
Originally posted by Stevedrivr:

Check out my reply to DemonSVT and then make your call.





Okay I read the "book" you wrote on re-machining the crank and such. Also that you are swapping an engine in to get the car running while rebuilding the old.

I still don't understand why you're not interested in a 3L? When even used longblocks can be found for less than $500? That should be nothing compared to the cost of forged rods and new pistons, which you didn't mention in your "book"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
S
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
Quote:

Okay I read the "book" you wrote on re-machining the crank and such. Also that you are swapping an engine in to get the car running while rebuilding the old.





Yeah, I guess I did get a little long winded! I felt I needed to prove a point and got a little carried away.
I guess hell hath no fury like a gearhead scorned! LOL!!

DemonSVT and I PM'd and everything's cool. And he brought up some interesting points I had not considered. We will continue to converse.

Quote:

I still don't understand why you're not interested in a 3L? When even used longblocks can be found for less than $500? That should be nothing compared to the cost of forged rods and new pistons, which you didn't mention in your "book"




Actually, since I'm buying some time I might just. No substitute for cubes, after all. Sometimes though I enjoy the challenge of being different; possibly I'm just eccentric. (Or thick headed!) Anyway, I guess I'll figure which direction to proceed after tearing down the old engine and seeing what kinda' damage has been done.

ATB,
Steve


Former, now returned CEG'er! 95SE MTX, (AKA "The Road Rat"). Stock except for:TH fix, B.A.T. big brake kit, tranny cocktail and lots of re-insulated wiring! May yet be a 3.0! "Speed doesn't kill, stupidity does!"
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475
Cool. Good luck with your project.

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by Stevedrivr:
DemonSVT and I PM'd and everything's cool. And he brought up some interesting points I had not considered. We will continue to converse.



Let's just say I was wrong on this one.

He has done his homework and shows plenty of experience.


I did bring up a few points about changing the engine from an over square to an under square (from a high rpm screamer to a stump puller IMO ) because that's what stroking a 2.5L would do.

Now a 3L starts out plenty over square and could be stroked back to a ratio around that of a 2.5L

However then custom length rods and piston to valve clearance becomes a serious issue. It would be a fair amount of design theory to work out what would work before you had a one-off set of rods & crank made. (I.E. $$$)

Still be very expensive either way and for what gains... Maybe 3 tenths of a liter tops. (raising the stroke ~10mm or an 89mm x 89mm engine = ~3.3L)
Rev ability and power band would be shortened though.

IMO that's very little bang for a lot of bucks...


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
S
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by Stevedrivr:
DemonSVT and I PM'd and everything's cool. And he brought up some interesting points I had not considered. We will continue to converse.



Let's just say I was wrong on this one.

He has done his homework and shows plenty of experience.


I did bring up a few points about changing the engine from an over square to an under square (from a high rpm screamer to a stump puller IMO ) because that's what stroking a 2.5L would do.

Now a 3L starts out plenty over square and could be stroked back to a ratio around that of a 2.5L

However then custom length rods and piston to valve clearance becomes a serious issue. It would be a fair amount of design theory to work out what would work before you had a one-off set of rods & crank made. (I.E. $$$)

Still be very expensive either way and for what gains... Maybe 3 tenths of a liter tops. (raising the stroke ~10mm or an 89mm x 89mm engine = ~3.3L)
Rev ability and power band would be shortened though.

IMO that's very little bang for a lot of bucks...




Thank you kind sir, you prove yourself to be truly both a gentleman and a scholar!

I do wish to get back to you when I get the chance with some questions/comments about the points you brought up in your PM. To be honest, I am only just beginning to research out my options on what to do about the eventual engine that will go back into this beast. As such many of the things you pointed out in your PM are things I should have considered, but most of my focus right now is on getting the Road Rat up and running again with the swapped engine. Then I'll get down to really doing my homework for the next engine.

Quick question though: Clearence/cost issues aside, wouldn't a perfectly square (89 x 89mm) engine with a longer stroke broaden the "area under the curve"? Some peak Hp/red line might be lost, but wouldn't both the Tq and HP curves flatten out, benefitting street drivability?

I very much look forward to continuing our conversation(s).

ATB,
(All The Best)
Steve


Former, now returned CEG'er! 95SE MTX, (AKA "The Road Rat"). Stock except for:TH fix, B.A.T. big brake kit, tranny cocktail and lots of re-insulated wiring! May yet be a 3.0! "Speed doesn't kill, stupidity does!"
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5