Originally posted by dubkatz:




unless there's a considerable amount of sarcasm we're not catching.



Anyone that knows be well, will know that im the most sarcastic person you will ever meet. Yes i know that the motors are completely diff. As Sam Jackson put it ounce "My azz may be dumn, but I aint no dumn azz" Paul did have had a very good statment saying the car is much more than the sum of its parts.Yes i would agree that they are very nice cars. Super car? NO. Every thing i ever read said 3rd gen rx7's were the nicest handeling cars ever. Although I have never drivin either so i cant argue. But i know one thing for sure. With 90k i could have a supra with 500hp at the wheel and enough suspension work to run circles around an nsx.
And I stand tall with my argument about rather owning a blown 3.0 tour. Because insurance on a nsx would kill me, I am very tall and need lots of room(that why i bought the tour in the first place ) And being were i live if i owned a nsx it would be stolen within a week :


Gosh i love pushing peoples buttons




You, sarcastic... never... I would agree with the statement about the 3rd gen RX7 though, definitely one of the nicest cars I've ever driven. I just was never a big fan of the engines in them, too many friends that went through them like S.D. guys go through MTX75's .

[flame suit on] Always been a dream of mine to drop in a Lingenfelter 427ci LS1 engine in a 3rd gen [flame suit off]


1999 Blk/Tan CSVT #654 - SOLD 2003 Suzuki SV650s