Originally posted by platinum_drew:
sounds like he was being neglegent to me. rear-end accidents are not always the rear-person's fault, if someone cuts in front of you when you're both doing 65 and slams on his brakes that's wreckless driving. now, you usually need a witness or the other guy to admit to it (yea right), but it still shouldn't b fault from how your story goes.
everything I said is true. The other guy was lying his 18 y/o butt off. I do have a witness which is my wife who was in the driver's side of the car. I'm going to have to fight like hell on this case I'm sure but my biggest peice of evidence is the impact of the two cars and the law's of physics that at that angle and that speed when I hit him (prolly around 25mph) that there is no way he could have spinned around like he told the cop. He was halfway turned when the cops got on scene! He told the cop that I spinned him around like that! I wanted to kill him!
I only have liability only so if our insurance companies pay e/o off because they determine the weather was the reason (doubt it) then I'm screwed.. right? Think they'd pay off my car?
95 Mystique GS Zetec ATX: Dead - Dec 5th, 2003
94 Accord LX 2.2L MTX Non-Vtec. Few bolt ons.
02 Escape XLT 3.0 V6 ATX. This thing has the CD4E in it?! What the hell was ford thinking?
| 
