|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
Originally posted by dartsoccer8:
Originally posted by todras:
Originally posted by trujap:
are those current pictures?
you mean to say that you have to snow over there?
Only snow in the US is in Minnesota and the MI U.P. Does WV even get snow?
wrong, utah had 2 feet of snow last weekend.
anchorage alaska had 24" in twelve hours last winter.
Last edited by luvinmycontour; 11/10/03 06:38 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 148
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 148 |
Originally posted by todras:
Originally posted by buchsvt:
Power.. much more.
Um no. Horsepower: 180 hp Torque: 173 ft-lbs. Gross Weight: 3836 lbs. 0-60 is identical to the SVT due to the power coming full on at 1950 RPM. Line up with an SVT with good drivers and it will be a drivers race but I'd put my $ on the SVT. Just look at the weight of the car alone. Now when you starting modifying the 1.8 it will smoke an SVT.
i dare you to race one. i have 4 friends with them. all of my friends are huge vw fans. its pathetic how bad one of them pulls me. its as fast as a wrx from a roll both stock. and at 5600 feet my friend ran a 14.8 at 96 with just intake and a catback. a 3l hybrid at this altitude wouldnt break a 15.5
my cars for sale, check the classified
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197 |
Anytime. Come to MI.  A buddy just got rid of his SVT for a 20th 1.8. I've riden both of course. He even thinks they would be very close. Some stock SVT's have ran 14.9 with the right driver FWIW. Another bench racing post.
-'96 SE MTX 3L
-'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535
-'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride
-Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 873
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 873 |
I have two friends with 20th's now and I'd love to have one also. They are very nice looking cars. I think they lack in the handling department slightly, but in the looks department they are right there with the SVT, maybe even a little more refined looking. Good purchase!
2004 Focus PZEV 2.3L - KW sport suspension, SP camber plates, Eibach front swaybar, FS intake, FS Stealth exhaust, 3.82 Final, Torsen ATB, Prothane MM insert, E1 CSVT wheels
1/4 mile - 15.201@89.4mph
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 148
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 148 |
Originally posted by todras:
Anytime. Come to MI. A buddy just got rid of his SVT for a 20th 1.8. I've riden both of course. He even thinks they would be very close. Some stock SVT's have ran 14.9 with the right driver FWIW. Another bench racing post.
well im not bench racing cause ive personally been killed a ton of times. i do live at a high altitude so my car is affected a lot more by alltitude then his but my corrected time slips are still slower then his uncorrected slips. they just have a much broader power range and lots more usable torque. even if the svt did hang he can chip his car for 500 dollars and get an extra 35hp and 50ft/lbs of torque
my cars for sale, check the classified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
