|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by David Z: 1. So you say the returnless 2.5L LIM would be better for flow,
2. but wouldn't the injector be asymmetrically positioned in the port?
I've seen some pics of the plastic 3L IM and I noticed that the injector sits in the middle of the port. I wonder how it would affect it if any, since it would be aimed at one port.
1. VERY Significantly!!! I could give you actual flow areas if you wanted.
2. True, but that makes zero difference in power production.
Also with some ingenious porting work you can easily get a bit of fuel to the secondary valve to keep it clean. That's all you really need anyway; something to keep that dirty pig clean!
Then keeping the dual runner manifolds will allow you to open up the heads a bit more (comparatively) for top end power and still retain great low range power thanks to just using the long runners.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|