|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,369
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,369 |
I hit a porkypine with mine and it killed it. Put a new one on and went to McDonalds and took a chip outta it. And thats without a drop. Airbags this winter!!!!
98 Lime Green SE w/SVT Kit, Projectors, CF Hood, 18" Rims, GC's, Shaved, System
98.5 Silver SVT #5737 Black FSVT Rims, MSDS, BAT Drop
85 Toyota PU Lifted
06 GSX R 600 Black/Silver
My Rides
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 435
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 435 |
If that happend to me this would come out of my mouth-!@#$%^&*+_<>?~/{}|:***&&^%%%@!#.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
hehe, send that my way if your gonna pitch it. ill fix that baby right up! 
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 93
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 93 |
Why not post it like this? 81K vs. 840K. 1/10th the bandwidth with the same horribly depressing look. That must have been a very sickening feeling when you first looked at it.  
doug
sturgis, michigan
1998 SVT Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,621
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,621 |
That's why I never wanted Mirco...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
Originally posted by skrilla187:
I hit a porkypine with mine and it killed it. Put a new one on and went to McDonalds and took a chip outta it. And thats without a drop. Airbags this winter!!!!
fuggin porcupine bastards! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,382
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,382 |
that's exactly why I never tried to get one. Missouri roads are horrible and my driveway would eat a splitter for breakfast, brunch, lunch, dinner and midnight snack.
"Fear is the little death."
Muadib.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 393
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 393 |
wow.
way to shrink those pics
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 253
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 253 |
Originally posted by 24vHO:
Why not post it like this? 81K vs. 840K. 1/10th the bandwidth with the same horribly depressing look. That must have been a very sickening feeling when you first looked at it.
I hate when people quote pictures because that just takes up more bandwidth. Besides this is a pics and videos forum  
Ouch is all I have to say AG. Ouch. 
05 RX-8 GT
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 93
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 93 |
Originally posted by mdaj:
Originally posted by 24vHO:
Why not post it like this? 81K vs. 840K. 1/10th the bandwidth with the same horribly depressing look. That must have been a very sickening feeling when you first looked at it.
I hate when people quote pictures because that just takes up more bandwidth. Besides this is a pics and videos forum
I'm sorry if you didn't notice, but I didn't "quote" a picture. I reposted at 1/10 the filesize. I was just trying to demonstrate that there really is no reason to post files at the filesize used. There are still a lot of people on here that don't have access to broadband connections and it seems it would be a common courtesy to them to allow them to see the posts. It took about 10 seconds to reduce the bitdepth of the picture and keep 99% of the detail. Unless you plan on having people print out enlargements off of the post then there is no need for more.
I agree that this is a pics and videos forum and some things will be too large for dialup. But when they don't have to be why not include everyone in the group in your posts?
doug
sturgis, michigan
1998 SVT Black
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
