|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732 |
i got 12 duratec camshafts !!!
4 3L
4 2.5
4 SVT
will i get triple the power if i put all 12 in the 3L?
Russell
Oval Port 3L Nearly Done
MTX75 w/ Homebrew Zetec FD and Torsen Complete
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 199
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 199 |
my engine design has 6cyl in the space of 4.......i dont have a scanner stazzi but i can mail em......
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,149
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,149 |
Originally posted by Zippy_Zetec:
no DOHC=2 cams man.
And this guy gives car advice... 
-- 1999 SVT #220 --
In retrospect, it was all downhill from here. RIP, CEG.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,231
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,231 |
Originally posted by sleeperv6:
my engine design has 6cyl in the space of 4.......i dont have a scanner stazzi but i can mail em......
VR6?
-06 GTO Torrid Red/M6
-98 LS with BPU
-05 Honda Odyssey EX-L
mv .zig ..\for\great\.justice
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50 |
Well I have mentally designed an engine that gives 16 cylinders in the space if a V6
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,660
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,660 |
Originally posted by IL Sean:
Originally posted by Stazi the Aussie:
You obviously have no idea... The extra cam would be redundant.  You can have 3 valves running of each cam.... Also the more cams etc you introduce, the more valve train drag you induce on the motor. The cons far outweigh the pros.
Yes, I'm a Mech Eng myself. 
Why not just amke the valves larger? More valves seems like going the roundabout way to get to the same point. But good job on thinking out side the box.
Because you run out of room in the head for larger valves and/or for better positioning of the flow. No, I'm not an engineer, I only play one on TV.
Scott
Troll! '99 BMW 328i
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Originally posted by cvkillacontour98:
... if you want to design a better engine design something stronger, with less weight, less moving parts, and more compact.
Can anybody say Rotary?
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Originally posted by Russell:
i got 12 duratec camshafts !!!
4 3L
4 2.5
4 SVT
will i get triple the power if i put all 12 in the 3L?
Yes, you will. Go for it.
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677 |
Originally posted by Zippy_Zetec:
no DOHC=2 cams man.
come back and eat your crow!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,049
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,049 |
a while back i had seen a article about stuff that was being worked on but i dont think ever came out. like electric valves and headgasketless engine and also a variable compression block that the head moves up and down to change compression. i think it was some stuff saab was working on. anyone seen that front wheel drive inline 6 on the suzuki i bet its pretty compact to fit in a front wheel drive car. i think its the suzuki verona it only has like 150 hp though(2.5 inline 6). one cool engien i saw in a magazine was a 1.6 twin turbo suzuki v8 it threw out 300 hp. i guess it never made it into production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
