Originally posted by delmar:


Now, everyone loves a quickie from time to time, but let's be real about this. How many women would actually consent to this scenario? How many women would go up to a stranger's room, bend over for 5 minutes, and then get the hell out of there like the building was on fire? None that I know of, certainly none that I've just met. Granted, I'm not a professional athlete, but I think I have a pretty good understanding of what's going on here.



i guess the fact that they had been together for a pretty good part of the day and she had basically been his personal concierge since he arrived doesn't count as time spent huh?

Originally posted by delmar:

The defense is trying to make us (the jury ) believe that the girl is a "slut", and by convincing us of that they can then introduce a "reasonable doubt" that the "rape" actually occurred. Basically, if she is a "slut", then even if the "rape" did occur, she must have deserved it. I'm not saying this is morally right, but it's the defense's job to get Kobe off (so to speak) and they'll do whatever they have to do to get the verdict.




really?

well how many women have sex with 3 different men in 3 days?

why did the "underpants" they tested the day she went to the hospital contain semen from someone other than bryant?

why was she allegedly bragging about the encounter at a party days after the supposed attack happen?

i'm not saying she's a slut because i don't know her or her sexual history. i'm sure that will all come out. if it quacks like a duck...

and no one has said she deserved to be raped. if her story is true then it will hold up in court. unless it continues to change...



'03 Saab 9-5 Aero