|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by SlowNfurious: wow thats pretty ugly
No it's not...
It's VERY ugly...
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 959
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 959 |
oh my uglyness
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143 |
i don't get how u people can say its ugly when its pretty much a tour with no side skrirts and a shaved trunk...
anyway, i think he atleast needs razzi side skirts...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 51
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 51 |
i think it looks very good. Its not ricey just clean looking. And maybe the reason he has no side skirts is because its soo low. The thing on the roof is called a sliding ragtop,i have one in my car. If you look in minitruckin or at most shows you will see alot of them. Personally i wouldnt have put those rims on THAT car, even though they would look good on something else
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 246
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 246 |
I think its awesome. That guy definately put some work into it . It's different..I like it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751 |
Originally posted by path914: Originally posted by SlowNfurious: wow thats pretty ugly
Whirling dervish of FFOG.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 192
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 192 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
Originally posted by NorMich99SE: I don't see why so many people think this is gross? Just cause it's slammed on bags with chrome wheels?? The thing is clean, nothing to break up the lines on the side, no graphics. the wheels are chrome yeah, so they're big and heavy but this obviously isn't a car meant to go on the track anyway. I think the wheels are actually fairly tasteful compared to some of the chrome creations out there. I bet if this got raised to a more usable height, and maybe the wheels were changed people would be talkin about how sweet it was, with maybe some comments about adding skirts and changing up the tails a bit. I personally think it's a pretty ncie car, and it's show cars that are going to get us noticed by the aftermarket anyway.
i'd hit it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475 |
Rear-end treatment is stoopid. Drop is RIDICULOUS. But otherwise ... Wheels are OK, for Chrome. Color is nice. It looks clean and basically stock other than the lack of skirts. However, about this ... Originally posted by StealthWyvern: it reminds me of skrillas car...
It looks FAR better than that mismatched puke green/white/chrome/carbon fiber mess!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,308
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,308 |
Originally posted by akrump47: However, about this ...
Originally posted by StealthWyvern: it reminds me of skrillas car...
It looks FAR better than that mismatched puke green/white/chrome/carbon fiber mess!
Im talking about shaved modes svt kits you know
97 Mystquie GS - I4 ATX died at 168K
94 Pontiac Crap AM SE - 2.3L I4 5spd
2002 Mazda Protege5 - 2.0L ATX
|
|
|
|
|
|