|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516 |
Oh yea I've raced one at the track. He CREAMED me, and my car is one of the faster ones on the board with a 2.5L. I ran a 15.1 to his 14.1  Needless to say he as stock!
Mazda 6S, V6, Speed Yellow
5 Speed, Sport package
Bose audio
Painted 'stash and HIDs!
w/Injen 1/4 14.750 @ 94.94
Former car:
99 Contour SE Sport Black MTX V6
SVT plastic...
1/4 - 15.012 @ 90.58 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Originally posted by DimitriPopov:
With a 3L and all of those mods shouldnt you be close or over the SRT HP output?
When I dyno'd I only pulled 190FWHP and 191FWTQ
Those numbers are not very impressive due to some very much needed tuning... I am still yet to do any tuning or computer/chip work so I hope to be around 200-205 with a little tuning... Then I'll make that guy work for a win
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,325
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,325 |
Found this dyno: http://www.dynoperformance.com/search_details.php?ID=525Only 3k miles on the engine, minimal mods and a dyno proven 233hp/264tq. It's spooled up with 250 ft/lbs at 2500 rpm. Good luck 
97 Contour SE MTX
K&N 3530, UR UDP, 19# Injectors, mystery mod, FMS wires, Fordchip.com chip, SVT: TB, Flywheel, clutch, exhaust
04 Grand Caravan SXT
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,248
CEG road warrior
|
|
CEG road warrior
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,248 |
Originally posted by I-Dom-In-8:
Originally posted by BStoneMega:
Don't be afraid of the car be afraid of the driver.
Well said.
Yes.
Hector
2003 Rally Red Mitsubishi Evolution VIII
257HP/259TQ
2005 Lapis Blue Mazda 6s
RET: 00 Cabernet Red Ford Contour Zetec ATX SUPERCHARGED
160HP/141TQ
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Originally posted by Zippy_Zetec:
no the SRT-4 puts out 250 lb ft of torque...even with a 3L (220 torque) it would be tough to match with Turbo and an exhaust system...you might get close, but probably not over, unless you use NOS out the ass.
The 3L torque curve is much broader. THis could be a benefit if you use it right. My 3L produced over 215 wHP, now its not as high as the SRT-4's average 225HP, but the curve is much broader. If I had worked to open up the intake(I ran a stock chopped filter box with a drop in K&N  ) more and ran true-duals it would have been a 220's car!
There is still the factor of weight, but a good driver could've used my car to scare the piss out of an SRT-4. 
I won't get into all the modifications thing or ATL-SRT will come in the night and snatch me up!
Modified they must be a Holy Terror. Of course, so is a modified turbo 3L!
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 706
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 706 |
I kid by me ran a 13.7 STOCK in an srt-4! 
"God Got a Good One"
1982-2004
I love you JLM!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,069
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,069 |
Yeah slap a turbo on either a stock SVT or a 3L and youve got some competition.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
Originally posted by warmonger:
Originally posted by Zippy_Zetec:
no the SRT-4 puts out 250 lb ft of torque...even with a 3L (220 torque) it would be tough to match with Turbo and an exhaust system...you might get close, but probably not over, unless you use NOS out the ass.
The 3L torque curve is much broader. THis could be a benefit if you use it right. My 3L produced over 215 wHP, now its not as high as the SRT-4's average 225HP, but the curve is much broader. If I had worked to open up the intake(I ran a stock chopped filter box with a drop in K&N ) more and ran true-duals it would have been a 220's car!
There is still the factor of weight, but a good driver could've used my car to scare the piss out of an SRT-4.
I won't get into all the modifications thing or ATL-SRT will come in the night and snatch me up!
Modified they must be a Holy Terror. Of course, so is a modified turbo 3L!
yes i agree warmonger, but you 3L is not your average 3L 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 59
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 59 |
15psi they don't boost that High stock do they?? I have seen a slue of them at the LVMS run low 14's. Even though they do make good power put a turbo on a CSVT and it would be a killer. Even if it was ran at about 10psi with a good tune it should have a much broader tq curve and much more cleaner hp curve than SRT4. Also one thing to keep in mind is the CSVT revs 1k higher than the SRT4. In a turbo application that means a world of difference.
98 CSVT E1
Previous Rides
03 Cobra
544rwhp & 585rwtq
10.89 at 135
97 Mustang Cobra P1SC intercooled
460rwhp & 412rwtq
11.47 at 120
89 GT w/347 mid 12's
99 Lightning mid 12's
95 Cobra Low 12's
I'm a sucker for speed
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
you guys all make good points, but lets start talking modded srt-4s to modded svt's then we'll see what happens. On a side note, I pulled my best time last night of 13.9, wohoo!!! I killed WR99SVT a couple times too in his new lightning, but he killed me back so we're even....
|
|
|
|
|
