|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Dustyn: Sorry didn't see that post in the other forum. [sic]
You are way off base about the TwEECer.
The PCM see's the TwEECer as it's actual tables. That should answer every one of your questions right there!
Changing on the fly is as simple as turning the switch to a different slot. As above the PCM see's this now slot's program AS IT'S ACTUAL TABLES.
Everything works as it should.
---
As for the update on the "flasher" option. 100% pure junk IMO!!! Stay far away from that BS.
If this 4-position chip can accept 100% fully custom programs to by the owner instead of the BS pre-fabbed best guesses then it sounds like it definitely has promise. However you can bet that option is the one in the 1 grand range. OUCH! Then you are right back to the fact a custom dyno tuned chip will garner the exact same results... Unless you plan on changing your setup, programs, etc often it would be an utter waste to drop $1000 for something you can get in the $300 range.
Then there is another fact. Exactly how much of the code for each one of our processor strategies and base code do they have cracked? Remember we are not "Mustang" owners. Each processor and code is different and must be cracked seperately.
Last time Ford chips tried to flash someone's SVT PCM they still couldn't up the rev limiter. Heck a few different people IIRC... Food for thought!!!
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|