|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489 |
yeah!
bush sucks and it's all clinton's fault! if he could only keep his pecker in his pants or his wife's mouth we'd never be in the predicament we're in today! 
'03 Saab 9-5 Aero
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,241
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,241 |
Originally posted by BP:
yeah!
bush sucks and it's all clinton's fault! if he could only keep his pecker in his pants or his wife's mouth we'd never be in the predicament we're in today!
yeah because thats clearly the argument i just made... dumbass. seriously.
i dont agree with the President of the United States being an adulterous assbag but thats not quite why i dont like the guy.
you suck at this BP 
-Matt
"Pain heals, chicks dig scars, and glory lasts forever!"
will do/pay just about anything for the following parts:
CF sunroof glass replacement
OEM CF trunk
Non OEM style cf or fiberglass hood not the cf1 design
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489 |
Originally posted by Speed Demon:
yeah because thats clearly the argument i just made... dumbass. seriously.
i dont agree with the President of the United States being an adulterous assbag but thats not quite why i dont like the guy.
you suck at this BP
well...my argument was much more obvious than yours.
step up your game speedy!
you suck at this!
'03 Saab 9-5 Aero
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,718
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,718 |
Originally posted by BP:
yeah!
bush sucks and it's all clinton's fault! if he could only keep his pecker in his pants or his wife's mouth we'd never be in the predicament we're in today!
Now there's a way to TOTALLY ignore what was said in a post and go off on a tangent...
JaTo
e-Tough Guy
Missouri City, TX
99 Contour SVT
#143/2760
00 Corvette Coupe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489 |
that's what i'm here for. glad i could be of assistance. your welcome. good night. 
'03 Saab 9-5 Aero
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,144
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,144 |
Originally posted by Speed Demon:
speaking of osama... throw a couple of cruise missiles at him why dont we... we're ninnys, he organizes attacks world wide against the United States, her territories and allies.. we spend $2m in cruise missiles on one night to give him the bird... way to go Bill, effective! There's a whole lot more Clinton could have done in the way of stopping terror but most of it seems to be sketchy so we'll leave it alone for now and stick to the facts.
As I recall correctly, the Republicans accussed Clinton of "wagging the dog" when he made attempts to take out Osoma BEFORE he did anything to attack the U.S. Republicans merely said he was trying to take focus off the Monica Lewinski ordeal, and any further attempts made by Clinton to take out Osama bin Ladden were denied by the same ones who are completely for it now. Hmmm... this reeks of hipocracy. 
99 SE Sport SilverFrost MTX
01 F4i Red/White
My mom says I shouldn't talk to conservatives.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by Dionysus:
Originally posted by Speed Demon:
speaking of osama... throw a couple of cruise missiles at him why dont we... we're ninnys, he organizes attacks world wide against the United States, her territories and allies.. we spend $2m in cruise missiles on one night to give him the bird... way to go Bill, effective! There's a whole lot more Clinton could have done in the way of stopping terror but most of it seems to be sketchy so we'll leave it alone for now and stick to the facts.
As I recall correctly, the Republicans accussed Clinton of "wagging the dog" when he made attempts to take out Osoma BEFORE he did anything to attack the U.S. Republicans merely said he was trying to take focus off the Monica Lewinski ordeal, and any further attempts made by Clinton to take out Osama bin Ladden were denied by the same ones who are completely for it now. Hmmm... this reeks of hipocracy.
Because they were half assed attempts at going after Osama. I mean they blew up a freakin' aspirin factory in Sudan for crying out loud. If nothing else, it was akin to throwing a few rocks at a hornets nest.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 93
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 93 |
I can't believe anyone would praise or even defend Busch's decisions up to this point. I mean so far he has shown our intelligence community as being totally innefectual. Can you tell me one thing they got right about Saddam's capabilities or the feelings of the people in Iraq? It's going to be very difficult to do anything militarily for a long time when no one believes our intelligence gathering. I'd rather believe that this administration cooked the books to warrant going to war than to believe our information gathering abilities are this weak.
As far as his new "preemption" policy, if you think that will make us more secure you are seriously deluded. The only way a country can now protect themselves against a country such as ours with such an overwhelming military is to develop nuclear capabilities. I'm certainly not going to feel more secure with every two-bit dictator having nuclear weapons at their disposal.
doug
sturgis, michigan
1998 SVT Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by 24vHO:
I can't believe anyone would praise or even defend Busch's decisions up to this point. I mean so far he has shown our intelligence community as being totally innefectual. Can you tell me one thing they got right about Saddam's capabilities or the feelings of the people in Iraq? It's going to be very difficult to do anything militarily for a long time when no one believes our intelligence gathering. I'd rather believe that this administration cooked the books to warrant going to war than to believe our information gathering abilities are this weak.
As far as his new "preemption" policy, if you think that will make us more secure you are seriously deluded. The only way a country can now protect themselves against a country such as ours with such an overwhelming military is to develop nuclear capabilities. I'm certainly not going to feel more secure with every two-bit dictator having nuclear weapons at their disposal.
It's BUSH, melonhead, not Busch.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 337
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 337 |
Originally posted by PackRat:
It's BUSH, melonhead, not Busch.
Oh, I dunno, I kind of like "Busch"
|
|
|
|
|
