|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
Yes, I've always heard that people trying to get the fastest possible times want those times even to be consistent even if they're not as fast as they possibly can be.
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165 |
Originally posted by Kremithefrog: Yes, I've always heard that people trying to get the fastest possible times want those times even to be consistent even if they're not as fast as they possibly can be.
So then who wins on a track: the guy that dials in at 14.00 and runs a 13.6 or the guy that dials in at 18.01 and runs an 18.02 ? If this were bracket racing, the 18 second turd. As has been stated, automatics on the track are for consistency. However, I'm sure you can yield a faster track time with computer controlled aggressive shifting, so long as there's a clutch driving the transmission and not a torque converter robbing power away from it.
'01 GTP: 3.3" pulley, Headers, 3" Exhaust, Straight Pipe, Intense Air to Water Intercooler. Pictures
Old Ride: 95 Mystique LS V6 ATX: Pictures
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975 |
Originally posted by Kremithefrog: I think once you get a certain amount of power, a properly built atx becomes much more helpful than a mtx.
But much less fun to drive around in...
1992 Ford Escort LX-E
-Tracer LTS spoiler
-GT Grille
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,859
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,859 |
Add some slicks, limited slip and a Capaldi final drive for a NA setup and you will be well on your way.
'99 Silver svt
For sale
19" Axis Neo wheels
3.0 parts, pre-98 trunk,
Check classifieds
bp.powell@comcast.net
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970 |
Originally posted by livinsvt: Add some slicks, limited slip and a Capaldi final drive for a NA setup and you will be well on your way.
....and a "race link" torque brace, solid motor/trans mounts, stage II axels.....
2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
Yeah, I'm sure running around in a 500hp+ zetec running on over 100 octane gas and drag slicks that barely allow you to turn is gonna happen daily. This post is about the fastest drag strip 'tour, not fastest daily driver, and not most consitent 'tour. If you wanted a bracket racer get a kia w/ auto. If you want a daily driver get outta this thread.
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165 |
Originally posted by Tim: Originally posted by Kremithefrog: Yes, I've always heard that people trying to get the fastest possible times want those times even to be consistent even if they're not as fast as they possibly can be.
So then who wins on a track: the guy that dials in at 14.00 and runs a 13.6 or the guy that dials in at 18.01 and runs an 18.02 ? If this were bracket racing, the 18 second turd. As has been stated, automatics on the track are for consistency. However, I'm sure you can yield a faster track time with computer controlled aggressive shifting, so long as there's a clutch driving the transmission and not a torque converter robbing power away from it.
BTW, the example was an extreme; it isn't too common for an 18 second car to be put into the same class as a 13 second car 
Tim
'01 GTP: 3.3" pulley, Headers, 3" Exhaust, Straight Pipe, Intense Air to Water Intercooler. Pictures
Old Ride: 95 Mystique LS V6 ATX: Pictures
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,506
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,506 |
Originally posted by Kremithefrog: Fastest drag cars made aren't 1 or 2 speed trannies w/o a reason. Turbo Tom is putting an atx in his white focus, so I'm pretty sure there's good reason for it. I think once you get a certain amount of power, a properly built atx becomes much more helpful than a mtx.
I agree with you ATX situation. for street driving, a MTX is great....but for more consistant times at the track, a ATX is always reconmned. Honestly, if my SVT was being built a purely a drag car for for drag comps, and i had the power,I would opt for putting a ATX level 10 (for starters) for more consistant times.
But since im doing Auto x and road corse events, MTX is well more suted for control of speed and RPMs for me...
Over all i second the ATX for drag cars.
Roz
3.0 SVT hybrid...all the fixens...Track/Race ready very soon!!!!!! 20,000 + miles
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
Anybody know if there are one/two speed ATXs? I know all the high powered RWD cars have one or two speed trannies (guy I know has a two speed power glide in his old malibu), but do any companies sell these for FWD applications?
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732 |
Originally posted by Swazo: Originally posted by livinsvt: Add some slicks, limited slip and a Capaldi final drive for a NA setup and you will be well on your way.
....and a "race link" torque brace, solid motor/trans mounts, stage II axels.....
will the torque brace fit an ATX? id like to get the street link if it does
Russell
Oval Port 3L Nearly Done
MTX75 w/ Homebrew Zetec FD and Torsen Complete
|
|
|
|
|