|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 299
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 299 |
Why not just convert to RWD!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087 |
Originally posted by GreenNuggs: Why not just convert to RWD!
...tries to pull money out of his @$$... Easier said than done
Matt
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX (WRB Stage 4+)
Old Rides:
1999 Sil-Fro SVT Contour 3.0L with goodies (Totalled 6/21/06)
1988 Bronco II (Sold)
You know you launch hard when you beat oncoming traffic through their own crosswalk lines.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 368
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 368 |
I think I just might have the answer to all our problems!!Have the Tour' at the Strip, 'Parked of Course,' wife driving it, while I/You come pulling in with your fully built, auctioned off, Nissan 240, Turboed to the beat of 400-500+hp and spending less than 10G's car and all. While you're at it there's a Drift session goins on and Solo Action as well down the road let's hit that up to.......Aint it beautiful
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 368
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 368 |
In all seriousNESS, we could tie it to the back of a 8 second Honda and be the First, IMPODomestic Tour' to clock such insane numbers....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732 |
Originally posted by PXRacing: In all seriousNESS, we could tie it to the back of a 8 second Honda and be the First, IMPODomestic Tour' to clock such insane numbers....
the only reason there are hondas that fast is because there are ricers out there with more money than brains and will put well over 20Gs into the engine
Russell
Oval Port 3L Nearly Done
MTX75 w/ Homebrew Zetec FD and Torsen Complete
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975 |
Originally posted by Russell: the only reason there are hondas that fast is because there are ricers out there with more money than brains and will put well over 20Gs into the engine
Then why is it, a lot of CEG'ers give contour ricers da Boot!? I'd rather see an ugly ricer contour with a 20K engine than and ugly ricer with a zetec all done out to 137HP. Seriously, it's hard even to be ricey with a contour, we have no "good" rice body kits. Seems we have to adapt from other cars for use on our cars. So the likelyhood of a mega-horsepower zetec with some 100 spokes and metallic puke orange and suede roof is un-likely.
1992 Ford Escort LX-E
-Tracer LTS spoiler
-GT Grille
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
There is a ricer body kit in the GB section. I promise you, I'll have the ricest highest HP contour one day. I've pretty much already worked out the ricey part.
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,944
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,944 |
Originally posted by Roz 1999 SVT-C: Originally posted by Kremithefrog: Fastest drag cars made aren't 1 or 2 speed trannies w/o a reason. Turbo Tom is putting an atx in his white focus, so I'm pretty sure there's good reason for it. I think once you get a certain amount of power, a properly built atx becomes much more helpful than a mtx.
I agree with you ATX situation. for street driving, a MTX is great....but for more consistant times at the track, a ATX is always reconmned. Honestly, if my SVT was being built a purely a drag car for for drag comps, and i had the power,I would opt for putting a ATX level 10 (for starters) for more consistant times.
But since im doing Auto x and road corse events, MTX is well more suted for control of speed and RPMs for me...
Over all i second the ATX for drag cars.
Roz
One problem.... we will most likely not get there with the CD4E. That is unless something happens in the near future. Ford just signed back on for the CD4E to be made until 2010, so something has to be up their sleeve!
One point was made awhile back by bnoon, I think, that an F/I ATX would be really nice since there would be no lose of boost between shifts.
*NOTE* The CD4E is limited to 200 ftlbs of torque *NOTE*
Hince the whole problem to our situation.
Phillip Jackson
`98 Mystique LS
262K+ and counting...
ATX rebuilt @ 151K
"This storm has broken me, my only friend!" RIP Dime
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
take everything off thats not needed. hood, trunk, doors, windows, fenders, bumpers, rear and passenger seats, all of it. strap a turbo running 8-10psi and a 100 shot of NOS in 3rd. and dont forget your drag slicks. weeeeeeeee! haha, i want to try that with mine sometime
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,465
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,465 |
Originally posted by Kremithefrog: Fastest drag cars made aren't 1 or 2 speed trannies w/o a reason. Turbo Tom is putting an atx in his white focus, so I'm pretty sure there's good reason for it. I think once you get a certain amount of power, a properly built atx becomes much more helpful than a mtx.
so why do the top fuel drag cars have a 3rd pedal in them?
and a shifter too
2003 Subaru WRX some mods
Even if you don't have the answer, you certainly have to admire the problem.
aka ZetecRacing
|
|
|
|
|