So are you saying that Michael Moore did not engage in the creative editing that Hardy claims he did?
Instead of calling what Hardy did a "Hatchet Job" why not show us where he is wrong.
It seems Hardy did a fair job of backing up his statement and showing how speaches where pasted together in the editing room to change the context of what Charleton Heston said.
Agree with Heston, or disagree, I don't really care, but if the allegation is true that Moore did selectively choose words and clips from different speeches, and put them together in an order that is no where near the context of the original speech, isn't that essentally Michael Moore lying?
So why don't you do the same and show where Hardy is wrong, instead of just calling it a hatchet job, without addressing the evidence presented?
That is fair, isn't it?
TB
