|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by ScottK: I'm pretty sure that STD and SAE are both "corrected" numbers - but like Demon posted above STD corrects to a lower temp than SAE so it will always give a slightly higher number.
Exactly my whole point.
Both STD & SAE are "correction" factors. STD just corrects to more favorable conditions then SAE and therefore "generates" better looking power curves. (that 3-4%)
If the numbers were "uncorrected" the graph would say as much. (Like Wavrdr stated my uncorrected numbers we better then my SAE numbers since it was ~57-59 degrees when I dynoed - Yes a negative SAE correction while STD added a couple)
Flecha - As you can surely read in my post. BOTH correct to ZERO humidity so the high ambient humidity (which we both suffer ) is therefore compensated for in the respective dyno numbers.
Also the barometric pressure is what compensates for elevation and atmospheric conditions. It's all considered.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|