Originally posted by daenku32:
Thanks Dan,
I'll remember to tell my dad and my grandpa that their marriages to their current wifes are POINTLESS since they are not going to be able to have any more children.

And since it's immoral to live together without being married, I need to tell them to live alone until they die too.

I'm glad Bush will be out of office in another ~18 mos.



But look at the fine work your dad did making you (liberal viewpoint exempted)! See what man & women can do when they put there mind to it..
Personnaly I do not see shacking up as immoral (though when children show up it gets iffy)..of course then, getting married makes sense. Rather than "expanding" the definition of marriage, could always "upgrade" the institution of "shacking up". Or create a new term. Certainly CAN redefine marriage..but it has worked well for a while so I'm just not sure it's the best thing to do. Perhaps it is..like I said, it dosen't seem a BIG deal to me relatively speaking. Just like the little Senator analogy on Rush today. Which I was able to hear his show more than once a week...fun stuff.

PS..Bush is going to WALK all over whomever the DEM focus groups get to run against him. I love the "sideline" of Hillary waiting in the wings...jump in if "weak" Bush is running but otherwise subtlely work against the Dem candidate that goes against "strong" Bush. Quality entertainment like that is just rare these days!!




1999 Amazon Green SVT Contour (#554/2760) "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." -Soren Kierkegaard (as posted by Jato)