Sorry, but I don't feel I was putting anyone down in any manner. I'm simply pointing out that the term 'better' once again has different meaning to different folks. Your post here is the first to define what YOU feel is better. Perhaps others better was one which stopped the car shorter, had plating on it, or even has special drilled holes for black magic looks.
In the simplest of terms, the use of any stock size rotor of any manufacture is not likely to boost the 'performance of the brakes' in some manner equated to shorter stopping distances. Yes, maybe some sort of gains are there for improved head room of upper temps by the use of fatter walls on the rotor. Had you read my second post you'd see this is pointed out. But this upper heat capacity comes at a price of thinner air gaps, thus when it gets hot it's going to tend to stay hot longer. Assuming it's moving. Brake fade is more often from pads exceeding their temp range than the rotors. Rotors too will have a saturation point as you suggest. The 'delusion' comes from only the hype of many companies telling you that brand X rotor is somehow going to decrease stopping distances, suggesting more brake torque. Which we know is simply not true.
Less likely to warp is an intersting request. More iron will supply you more saturation point. Maybe that will help. However I'd stil say most 'warpage' comes from lack of proper cooling than too much heat.
Sorry if I'm playing dumb, I'm only offering up what I can. Take it for what you feel it's worth.
