Originally posted by ZetecRacing:
clearly you don't even know what a UDP is cause they are always lighter and smaller in diameter.



<shaking head in disbelief...>

<contemplating quitting CEG in frustration at how hard it is to communicate simple ideas without them being turned upside down one minute later...>

Dude, didn't I say ALL ALONG that it's because you combined the lighter weight with the reduced diameter, that you can't credit lightened weight in itself for any dyno/ET gains?

This is not a rhetorical question. If you're going to give me crap like this "clearly you don't even know what a UDP is" line, you'd better be able to come up with SOME kind of justification for it. So go back and check if you have to. Is that, or is it not, what I said all along?

Now. What are we arguing about? What is the position we are disagreeing on? Once more, this is not a rhetorical question. I'd like a f'in answer. Can you tell me what the difference between my position and your position is?

ONCE YOU'VE GOT THAT STRAIGHTENED OUT, THEN WE CAN TALK. Otherwise this is a complete waste of time.




Okay, in case nobody wants to go back and actually look, I was disagreeing with a particular claim made by you, Sleeper, Kremit, and fingas: that lightening the pulley's weight frees up significant horsepower and torque, separately from any torque and horsepower freed up by reducing its diameter. THIS IS NOT a disagreement about whether a UDP does or does not give gains overall.

WHAT DOES IT TAKE to get you to pay attention to what I'm actually saying??????????????