Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums General Common Interests Three's the charm for the Supreme Court

You missed my whole point in both cases. The first point was I'm not a frog. The second point wasn't about two consenting adults but rather about what we're attracted to. You have grown adults attracted to children and of course that's a problem. Like I wrote, the point was about the attraction since that was the argument used for homosexuals. We can find all kinds of things in nature to justify our actions because that's all we're doing here. If you don't believe in the scriptures and the fact that we were created in God's image than fine, compare the human race to anything you want in nature.

Also, I didn't say anything about the choice of being gay. My point, again, was about the choice of acting on it. The same as someone who is attracted to children. They have a choice as to whether they want to act on those feelings just as I have a choice as to whether I want to act on the feelings I have for a woman. That's the choice I'm talking about.