Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums General Common Interests Three's the charm for the Supreme Court

JaTo, you go back and forth too much for me. You all over the place with your explanations comparing OT to NT, simplest creatures to the most complex, etc.

You obviously have some problems with the Bible. Personally, I think you miss some very simple points illustrated by the writer, Paul in this case, was trying to convey. You're like most people I've run in to who don't want to take the text of the scriptures at face value. I agree that at times you need to understand the context of the situation to correctly understand the scriptures but in other instances its meaning is clear without it. Why doesn't it touch on certain themes? Don't know, perhaps it's not important.

ALso, I don't need the Bible to hide behind in regards to this subject. It was brought in to play by you. And I guess the only reason why it was, was so that you could shoot down the many religious groups who don't believe in folks being gay based on the scriptures. Like I stated earlier, I don't believe it to be natural and I don't care if a damn male frog humps another. If it was natural and by some chance the whole human race became gay, how the hell would we reproduce? I've heard of several females in a species who kill the male after sex. Since that is a natural process in the animal world, I guess it'd be okay if women started killing us men because we always get off before they do?! I guess petifiles (sp?) would qualifiy in this context too? They can't help being attracted to children, right? Please explain the difference if there is one.

This is not passing judgement in my context which would be to condem that person for their lifestyle. If they want to live like that, it's on them. Just don't try to tell me it's natural. That's all I'm saying.