Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,264
H
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
H
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,264
Originally posted by RMk:
*ahem* 6x9 Alpine Type-R 2-way coaxials in the package tray. Louder than the 6.5 components in my front doors. Lowered the gain to the 6x9s until it evened out. Sounds fantastic. What's the problem with mids/highs coming from the rear?

R>




Sounds fantastic compared to stock, yes. Compared to a moderately well set up system with no rear speakers (we are talking stereo here, not surround) and a decent set of components in the front properly crossed, it won't sound right. I'll use the often used analogy here, when you go to a concert, which way do you like to face? Away from the stage looking at the back wall? Do you go up and stand in between the speakers on the stage? Or do you stand/sit facing the stage?

It's true surround sound recordings use many microphones placed around the room to achieve a true 3 dimensional sound, but your car stereo is more than likely not a surround sound device as they are few and far between) Remember, 4 speakers don't automatically make surround sound. The front and rear channels are twins, playing identical frequencies.

Stereo recording is based in front of the source. You should have everything set to appear as if it's sitting on your hood in essence. Your only worries are keeping the left/right channels in allignment (hard to accomplish in a car, but possible now thanks to time alignment) Your package tray speakers may seem nice to you, and that's really all that counts I suppose. If you want to reproduce the original recording as accurately as you can, you would be better off to get rid of the package tray speakers and instead focus on the front end. I can guarantee you that once hearing a system like this you will want to emulate it.

You note the 6x9s produce more volume than the 6.5s, but you even say yourself you end up turning them down so they don't overshadow the front end. What's the point of putting the big speakers in the rear if you are just going to cut the power to them anyways. You would have been much better off with a small subwoofer in the rear (I would tell you to put it up front too, but there is no room for that without making some sacrifices in comfort and aesthtics), and work on the front soundstage. As I said I've had speakers in the rear and after hearing a proper system, I removed them and haven't looked back since.


2003 Ford Focus ZX3 "Tarmac" http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2352003
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 30
R
New CEG\'er
Offline
New CEG\'er
R
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 30
Honkeytonk Monkey wrote:
Quote:

You note the 6x9s produce more volume than the 6.5s, but you even say yourself you end up turning them down so they don't overshadow the front end.




This is only because the rear speakers are receiving slightly more power (about +11 RMS). Anyways...

Quote:

What's the point of putting the big speakers in the rear if you are just going to cut the power to them anyways. You would have been much better off with a small subwoofer in the rear (I would tell you to put it up front too, but there is no room for that without making some sacrifices in comfort and aesthtics), and work on the front soundstage. As I said I've had speakers in the rear and after hearing a proper system, I removed them and haven't looked back since.




This is mostly due to a person's taste, I suppose. I AM looking forward to a DSP and a few screens, so rear speakers, a subwoofer and a center channel (5.1) will be essential. There's a reason I've been asking all the questions I have been and its only because I want the highest possible quality, theatre-like sound in my car. Bright highs, "punchy" (to which I have heard it referred) midbass and low, low lows.

I'm almost there, and I've only dropped about $800 so far, which isn't that bad considering I'm happy with it (even the way it is now) and I've paid about 50-70% less than what retai would have been.

Regarding the front soundstage in a stereo-only setup, "rear fill" as its called has its place. While you do face the stage at a concert, rarely are the speakers only in front of you, ON the stage. There are concert halls with speakers all around and it produces an all-enveloping effect that many people prefer to all-stereo, all-from-the-front style sound that you and many others prefer. It's pretty much 50/50, or perhaps more skewed.

All I know is that I like my rear fill and, well-balanced, I prefer it. Everyone with decent front speakers & a subwoofer... throw your faders all the way to the front and see how you like it without ANY rear fill. I just don't care for the lack of environment. Just me. <G>

.RMk..


'99 SVT, Silver Frost Open K&N w/ heat shield, various other, more unimportant mods.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,264
H
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
H
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,264
If you think it sounds good then I'm not going to convince you otherwise. Have fun with it, but with 5.1, you may want to consider a component set bot front and rear so you can better adjust the speaker imaging with the added mounting possabilities a seperate tweeter gives you Also, you may want to look at a dedicated woofer for lower frequencies to put in the front, allowing you to cross the subwoofer at 60hz or lower, making it harder to locate audibly.

I would suggest something similar to this, the numbers are rough because obviously all speakers have different characteristics. If you truly want the best sound you can get you are going to have to look into equalizers pretty soon as well. With that many different size speakers playing at once, there is bound to be some unwanted noise.

1+2- 7" woofers (60ish to 800ish)
5.25" mids (800ish to 10Kish)
tweeter would cover the rest

4+5- 6.5" midbass (80ish to 10Kish)
tweeters cover the rest

3- 5.25" mids (80ish to 10Kish)
tweeters cover the rest

.1- a subwoofer to cover anything under 60Hz.


2003 Ford Focus ZX3 "Tarmac" http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2352003
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,092
C
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
C
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,092
Quote:

Everyone with decent front speakers & a subwoofer... throw your faders all the way to the front and see how you like it without ANY rear fill. I just don't care for the lack of environment. Just me.




Been there and done it. I've experimented with rear fill in full-range and cut at 3,000Hz. IMO, it just sounds better without it (although cutting it at 3,000Hz didn't mess up the front soundstage as much).

Most people who have heard my car don't believe it's only got 5 total drivers (2 tweets, 2 mids, and 1 sub) even rear seat passengers.

But... Everyone's ears are different... Gotta do what sounds best for you.


1999 Ford Contour SVT #900/2760 (SOLD) 2005 Mazda 6s 2003.5 Mazdaspeed Protege 1998 Ford Ranger 4x4
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
H
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
H
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
/


Hugo AIM:omegazodiac 95 gl & 99 contour svt #1750/2760 my profile pics stuff for sale
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14
T
New CEG\'er
Offline
New CEG\'er
T
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14
I like an ambient fill of sound from the rear.

I have a pair of ADS 320i 5 1/4" mid/woofs mounted in the rear deck. I placed the tweeters on either side of the back seat firing forward.

I put a pair of Kicker 570i's in the doors and left the tweeters coaxially mounted, but tilted up.

I fade it forward, about 30%. Either pair alone sounds fairly boring by comparison.

No subwoofs, as I'm not willing to give up the trunk space, spend the money, etc.

Last edited by tnv2001; 09/23/03 12:26 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  dnewma04_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5