Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 310
C
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 310
If you change the CSVT tires form the stock 215/50/16 to the 225/50/16 size (on the stock wheels), does the variation of the height of the ride noticeable? Do you have to lower the car?


Captain Bart 1999 Black/Midnight Blue SVT #1949/2760 Built on 04/20/1999 Received on 05/07/1999 Sold on 08/03/2006
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
C
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
C
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
Well the first number-225 is how wide in millimetres the tire is so its 22.5 cm wide. You aren't changing the height at all, just the width

So it goes Width/Percent of width=Sidewall height/tire in inches

The only way to get a lower car with same rim would be getting a small sidewall. So a 215/45,40,35,30/16


1992 Ford Escort LX-E -Tracer LTS spoiler -GT Grille
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 133
2
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
2
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 133
Specification Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revs/km Difference
215/50-16 108mm 311mm 621mm 1952mm 512 0.0%
225/50-16 112mm 316mm 631mm 1984mm 504 1.6%


See http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html


Anthony B. Davis 2Deep2 Silver SVT 2002 IASCA SQ Ult Ama 601+ World Champion runner up 2002 SLAP dBQ Champion 2000 USAC SQ World Champion 2002 USACi SQ World Champion
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 310
C
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 310
You may be right but the overall diameter of the stock 215/50/16 tires is 24.3" while that of the 225/50/16 tires is 24.9" (unloaded), a difference of 0.6" in diameter or 0.3" in radius. This should, in principle, affect the height of the ride by an amount smaller than 0.3" when the tires are loaded. Am I wrong?


Captain Bart 1999 Black/Midnight Blue SVT #1949/2760 Built on 04/20/1999 Received on 05/07/1999 Sold on 08/03/2006
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
Originally posted by Captain Bart:
You may be right but the overall diameter of the stock 215/50/16 tires is 24.3" while that of the 225/50/16 tires is 24.9" (unloaded), a difference of 0.6" in diameter or 0.3" in radius. This should, in principle, affect the height of the ride by an amount smaller than 0.3" when the tires are loaded. Am I wrong?


your correct, but it depends on the tire, look at the stats of different brands/models of tires and you'll notice that they are almost all different. But not by very much. you could get a 225/50 that would have the same sidewall height as a 215/55. But seriously, 3/10" is not noticable when looking at the car, I wouldnt worry about it. Its mainly the width that you will be gaining.


2000 SVT Black/Tan #1633/2150 (a few mods) Alpine: CDA-9835, MRV-F540, MRD-M550 PG: TANTRUM-X 6.5 COMP all around. Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas. CEL currently: Off
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 310
C
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 310
Thanks for the reply.

The reason I asked the question is that last week I installed a set of Firehawk SZ50 EP in the 225/50/16 size. The listed overall diameter is 24.9". The original BFG g-force tires had an overall diameter of 24.3", thus a difference of 0.6" in diameter or 0.3" in radius.

However the 24.9" overall diameter is measured on a 7" wide rim while the 24.3" diameter is measured on a 6.5" rim. This would increase the listed diameter of the Firehawks by about 0.2" and the radius by 0.1".

According to this simple calculation, the radius difference between the new and the old tires is then 0.4" which is also the increase in the height of the car.

This is indeed a small height difference but I think I noticed it.

I wonder if other SVT owners who have installed a new set of 225/50/16 tires on stock suspension agree with this observation.


Captain Bart 1999 Black/Midnight Blue SVT #1949/2760 Built on 04/20/1999 Received on 05/07/1999 Sold on 08/03/2006
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
Ive got 225/50/16's I think it depends more on the design of the sidewall than it does the actual diameter. I had kumhos to begin with on the rears and they had a very flat/plain sidewall, which made them look larger than the Dunlop A2's that I have on there now. Some tires the tread actually wraps around the edge of the sidewall a little more, making the sidewall appear smaller.


2000 SVT Black/Tan #1633/2150 (a few mods) Alpine: CDA-9835, MRV-F540, MRD-M550 PG: TANTRUM-X 6.5 COMP all around. Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas. CEL currently: Off

Moderated by  1314_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5