|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,148
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,148 |
Originally posted by Kremithefrog: I imagine insurance rates for both would be about equal. Yes the EVO is a better performer. But it looks like crap. Maybe if you're buying it to never drive it on the street and just use it at the track, then it's ugliness would be ok. The STi is so close in perfomance though that you can get it, do a few mods and be killing EVOs and look infinitely better.
in your opinion the STi looks better and there's nothing wrong with that. in my opinion neither the STi or Evo are very eye catching but thats what the aftermarket is for. bottom line is that both cars are a blast I'm sure but personally I'd choose the better performing car (and cheaper) over the slightly better looking one.
|
|
|
|
|
|