Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by Kremithefrog:
Demon, you do realize that motortrend alters their numbers based on set values. I mean they correct for elevation, heat, etc. to give more accurate numbers.


That changes the numbers to a fairly "close" estimation but it does not count the intagibles. Like the fact the IC's are using extremely hot air to cool the intake charge (that's a big factor!) and no matter what correction factors you use you can never equal runs done in ideal conditions and sea level!

I think the Evo in stock form will definitely crack the 12's without a problem with good weather! Corrections factors are okay, but never "exact" They always come up short of the real thing.

Either way 13 flat is blazing fast. Especially for a "rated" 271HP


As for looks. They both suffer from the front end Fuglies! Neither car is very good looking or has very clean lines.
Both cars have econo car interiors as well. The Mitsu's ergonomics is more for the driver while the Subbie's is little more towards cruising.

There is no real winner here. Either car looks infinitely better in it's previous body style.

It seems like the manufacturers producing the turbocharged cars are having problem rating the power.....good for us.

I agree the cars are not all that great looking, but if I had a choice it would be the EVO.

Hector 2003 Rally Red Mitsubishi Evolution VIII 257HP/259TQ 2005 Lapis Blue Mazda 6s RET: 00 Cabernet Red Ford Contour Zetec ATX SUPERCHARGED 160HP/141TQ