Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,291
T
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
T
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,291
~1100 ft.


How many Vs would a VTEC TEC if a VTEC could TEC Vs? The one, the only....FRNKNFORD http://www.westvalleycs.com
#649147 05/30/03 08:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
tom, do u have any head work done? and your using 3.0L heads correct?



Tom did all his own head porting.

He used the SVT heads which he opened up.
He also took a little material out of the chambers to lower the compression to around the ~10.2 range.
He is running the 3L valves of course.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#649148 05/30/03 09:01 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 225
S
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 225
Congrats man... Thats real impresive>>>>


"SOMETIMES IT TAKES PAIN TO MAKE THE BRAIN WORK HARDER" M.O.B
#649149 05/31/03 07:25 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 570
F
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
F
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 570
Great numbers Tom! We all knew it would put it down!!!

#649150 05/31/03 07:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 228
W
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
W
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 228
WOW! That is so awesome man. Keep up the good work and let us know how everything goes at the track.


Black 99 CSVT #1820 of 2760 -Current Mods- DMD, KKM, Koni-Kit, HPP rear strut tower bar, metal water pump, tinted windows, Pioneer DEHP4600MP, 6x8 Pioneer 4ways
#649151 06/01/03 06:42 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Wow. You guys are making me blush

Thanks for all the support, but remember to put in the effort so you can reap the benefits.

Demon is right about the heads, they are hand ported with 3L valves, exhaust ports opened up to the gasket diameter, intake ports opened up to the gasket diameter and tapered on into the head.
Lower intake manifold is overbored to the diameter of the gaskets on both primary and secondary with just a tad bit of taper to it. The upper IM is ported at the exit ports by hand and up inside around the turn to the best of my ability. I did 6 Hours of hand porting work on that upper intake manifold and it could use a little more if I was after perfection.
The Throttle body used was the stock 60mm SVT , but I have it bored up to 70mm at the inlet to accept my MAC 70mm TB. I would have used the 70mm in the test but there was some discussion as to whether the 70mm was causing my idle problem so I just put the 60 back on for initial tuning. The 70mm proved to make a little better power at the top of my rev range when I was naturally aspirated, so I expect it will have some good benefits with the turbo.
For starters the turbo graph seems to show a bit of restriction in either intake or exhaust causing the torque to drop off above 6000 rpm.
If I don't raise the boost at all, but improve breating a bit more and carry that 260 torque all the way up to 6750, I'd put down 334 HP!!!!!
There is also the possibility that the cams have too much overlap and it may be a little more difficult at those rpms to keep the pressure the same. If that is the case, then raising the boost would solve that, but then I'd be generating much higher levels of torque in the midrange of the graph. I know, worrying about too much torque
It is a fact that Chris (Keyser) ran as much as 270 torque on at least one occasion but nothing over that. If I start putting down torques in the 300 range then perhaps the rods may be running closer to their ultimate strength. I am still planning on running 8-10 psi here in the near future just to see what happens, but I am going to be a little more cautious.
There is another possibility also, GReddy sells boost controllers like the E-01 that allows you to control boost over RPM. It can allow smoother onset of boost and allow it to increase and decrease boost to keep the torque curve flat. I am kind of looking for a flat-line 270 torque for street trim driving, all the way to 7000 rpm.
270 torque at 7000 rpm will yield 360 wHP with no increase in torque and no addition load stress on the rods.

Race trim with a pair of slicks and I may shoot for higher boost like 10psi with some octane adders.

What do you think Demon, restriction, cams or a combination of both causing the torque to fall off?

Tom



Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
#649152 06/02/03 02:21 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,713
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,713
Tom, I'd like to congratulate you as well. All that hard work has certainly paid off!

Second:

Originally posted by warmonger:
restriction?





At this point...I don't know if once could define "restriction" in your engine!


Derek Scion xB 5-spd Previous: 2000 Silver Frost SVT Please share the road with cyclists.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Darryl,

I told Chris to call everyone, he was so busy tuning his own car that he didn't call anyone. I did call Jason but it was too late to get him to come. I must confess until Thursday afternoon I was too busy to think about anything else. You would have liked checking the car out on Wed when we were installing the intercooler.

When I get home I'll take some pictures of the engine bay so you can see how cool the intercooler is.


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,517
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,517
Congratulations Tom! Now I'm too embarassed to post my lowly naturally aspirated untuned 3.0L numbers...


Now owner of 0 SVT's. my web page
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
I think that at the meager 5.5psi the turbo was well below it's efficiency range to support the CFM demands of the 3L at said atmospheric pressure.

The map for your turbo shows it should like 9-14psi range the best. (14psi - stress testing at it's finest I tell you - You chicken )


Maybe if you had a mere 2.5L then 5.5psi might have been sufficient.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  mbb41_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5