This is so weird. Your model that you posted for was tested in August of 2001. The car I was getting specs from was in December 2002. But the car I posted for was SUPPOSED to be faster. It is the Type S RSX FP (Factory Performance) car. It ran slower than the stock regular Type S which is why they stated the car was soft in comparison. My bad. Didn't completely read into it. My article was a later test of a factory performance RSX and it turned out to be slower than the basic Type S. Car and Driver can be ghey sometimes. Oh well. The specs you provided are pretty accurate then. Perhaps a little under-rated considering they never dog the [censored] out of their test cars when someone on the street will.
SVT Driver 1
