|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,094
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,094 |
The CSVT is a better ride. 
'95 GL White
I've got mods.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 716
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
OP
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 716 |
Originally posted by MotorCity:
Originally posted by DaxD:
maybe its got the new jackson racing supercharger that just came out. (how much power do those things add anyway?)
It seems to be bringing the wheel HP to about 205. Its a mild setup that runs at around 5 psi. It only runs about $2700 dollars too. I want one. 
There are more agressive setups coming out but pretty much everything has to be specifically made for the FSVT as far as turbochargers and superchargers go. The stuff for other Zetec based engine does not work outright. So right now more products are starting to come out for the FSVT.
do they make em for 95 zetec tours?
95 GL MTX Zetec, Carbon Fiber hood:
*neoprene seat covers
*new SVT rear bumper 
*Proud Owner of 1962 Chevy Corvette 427
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,248
CEG road warrior
|
|
CEG road warrior
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,248 |
Originally posted by 1fast95tour:
Originally posted by MotorCity:
Originally posted by DaxD:
maybe its got the new jackson racing supercharger that just came out. (how much power do those things add anyway?)
It seems to be bringing the wheel HP to about 205. Its a mild setup that runs at around 5 psi. It only runs about $2700 dollars too. I want one.
There are more agressive setups coming out but pretty much everything has to be specifically made for the FSVT as far as turbochargers and superchargers go. The stuff for other Zetec based engine does not work outright. So right now more products are starting to come out for the FSVT.
do they make em for 95 zetec tours?
No. 
Hector
2003 Rally Red Mitsubishi Evolution VIII
257HP/259TQ
2005 Lapis Blue Mazda 6s
RET: 00 Cabernet Red Ford Contour Zetec ATX SUPERCHARGED
160HP/141TQ
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,469
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,469 |
Originally posted by LoCoZ2.0:
Originally posted by ETayrien:
according to car and driver, curb weight is 2600-2750 lb. Not that light.
well.. on second thought, maybe it is. about 500 pounds lighter than a contour, is that right?
About 400 lbs less then the SVT IIRC. 
Actually about 220 lbs lighter for 4Dr FSVT (2820 vs 3040 for CSVT)..the 2Dr FSVT is about 2750 or about 290-300 lbs lighter.
The FSVT in question had either FI, nitrous, or internally built motor. Not just bolt ons. Unless the WRX REALLY blew a shift.
1999 Amazon Green SVT Contour (#554/2760)
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."
-Soren Kierkegaard (as posted by Jato)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 353
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 353 |
Quote:
Actually about 220 lbs lighter for 4Dr FSVT
Didnt know there was a 4dr FSVT, i heard that was the next to be released but didnt know the ZX5(SVT) or 4dr FSVT was out.
Then again,,last night at the track i saw a 89 turbo'd ford escort hatch and an 88 ford ranger turbo'd
There were 3 Neon SR-T's out there. 1/8 mile track they were runnning mid to high 9's bone stock. They all kept losing to WRX's,,but just barely
I drive a Ford, what else do you need to know??
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 113
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 113 |
never under estimate the lack of ability of the guy in the car next to you, especially if his mouth is louder then his ride!!!!!! 
98 SVT, silver frost, with blue graphics.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 716
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
OP
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 716 |
Originally posted by Dan Nixon:
The FSVT in question had either FI, nitrous, or internally built motor. Not just bolt ons. Unless the WRX REALLY blew a shift.
i dont know dan, but it was the sickest thing i have ever seen
95 GL MTX Zetec, Carbon Fiber hood:
*neoprene seat covers
*new SVT rear bumper
*Proud Owner of 1962 Chevy Corvette 427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
