|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,420
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,420 |
Mikey Boy Shut the F u C k UP man , ,stop folowing me around and starting wars ........
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732 |
just wait till mines done
pre98 svt bumper, hellaRS sides and rear, 17" RS-6s, maybe a mirko spliiter, dropped,new paintjob, oh ya, no wing
Russell
Oval Port 3L Nearly Done
MTX75 w/ Homebrew Zetec FD and Torsen Complete
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 766
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 766 |
Originally posted by --CitatioN10--:
Very Nice
He did say this. So apparently he changed his mind. No need to go starting something. Besides, everyone has an opinion. So what's wrong with CitatioN10 voiceing his? 
Ken
PackRat is my hero!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,420
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,420 |
Thank god , somebody did see i changed my mind , I just didnt see many pre 98's hooked up . But i did see some now and i agree there NICE !
"mikey boy - Motorcity - SteedaSVT " just have problems with following me around and starting wars here .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 766
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 766 |
Originally posted by --CitatioN10--:
folowwing
Just so you know, it's spelled "following". 
Ken
PackRat is my hero!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
I do think that there plenty of tight looking pre98's out there, but come on fellas, more aggressive??? Better looking?? Please. Got Penis Envy?      I don't even have any of Pascal's good pics anymore either. I could go on, but why bother? Flame suit on!  credits.... 1-OutlawdSVT 2-don't know 3-Deion 4-PhatSVT 5-Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,022
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,022 |
i must agreee on this 1... i do believe that the post-98's SVT's have a more agressive look ..DUH! lol...and the post-98 headlighs of stock look better... but with mikey's photoshops of the pre-98 body kits my vote goes for the pre-98. they just compliment the car so much. im not bias or anything...i just own a pre-98 *wink*
95'Contour GL 2.5L (JUNKED!)
~~~
[Current Car]
1995 Ford Mustang 5speed
[Upcoming Car]
2002 Trans Am WS6 (Black on Black)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,012
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,012 |
Oo (xxx)oO
o xxxxxxxx o
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143 |
one thing I would have to disagree on is the pre98s looking more aggressive...with that smiley face front I don't see how thats possible.
98+ have a way better looking front end but pre98 backs look way better...I still think its damn possible to make a pre98 look tight though, I hope to make mine look good.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292 |
okay okay, i take most of what i said back, but it does look better than a stock svt, that black one is second on my list behind that black one with black wheels and the carbon fiberhood that was just posted
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but STUPID lasts forever."-Aristophanes.
--93 pgt,headers,intake,borla=14.9 1/4mile
|
|
|
|
|
