Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by kinger:

Stock 3L 200/200 hp/tq

Final HP 320/260ish (safe tune)

Improvement 120/60 HP/TQ


SVT 2.5L: 200/167 HP/TQ (already tuned for premium fuel vs the 3L's 200/200 tuned for 87! Think about that too!)

Final: 320/232 HP/TQ (stock chip tune)

Improvement: 120/65 HP/TQ

I just expected a larger gain from a larger engine. I never said your power output was bad just that "I" expected more based on previous data from the other combonations out there.



Assuming your "FINAL" numbers are a SC 2.5 then the SVT starts at 200 hp, so does the 3L.

A SVT gains 60-65 TQ so does a 3L.

My point being these are exactly the numbers that SHOULD be expected. Its illogical to expect otherwise.

Buckshot will give you the numbers you want because we uncorked the hell out of his heads, which is the limiting factor on this set up but which was intentional because I was leary of rod strength. On a agressive tune like Brad said we had 302 which would have been safe provided I had at least 92 all the time, but with no IC, lack of 92, why risk it.

I offer PnP Heads for all durtec's details at PnPheads.com or jesse@pnpheads.com for details.