I don't know what else I can say outside of all the info & data I have supporting "my opinion"
The "Ave S/C 2.5" numbers are 3 car's "regular" dynos averaged together. No special tuning. Some easily visible proof of the that is that "not very linear" power curve the average shows.
However even using that against the (safety tuned) 3L dyno (BTW my original commments were made "before" he mentioned that safety part) and using the more realistic powerband of 4000rpm to 7000rpm...
Jesse's car makes an "average" of +3.8% HP & +10.9% TQ for an engine 20% larger.
My whole point was and is that IMO I expected his average power numbers to be better. Especially the HP curve. IMO...
Also something I will add is after I took the time to actually plot out all his numbers in this chart and the subsequent graph plotting verses the other's curves (numbers are one thing but actually seeing the curves compared to one another helps a lot) I was quite impressed with how smooth and linear the tuning job was.
,.;..! (making up for that long sentence

)