|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2
Newbie
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT: Originally posted by RTStabler51: IMO it would be stoopid to run a direct port dry kit, plus I would think you would piece it together
So then IYO a returnless car will never be able to run a direct port setup then.
I may hold you to that you know. 
BTW - why is a single entry dry kit fine & dandy but when it evenly distributes the nitrous to each port it's stoopid???
Perhaps I can shed some light on this subject. It is possible to have a direct port dry system in a returnless fuel car if you can monitor proper nitrous pressure going into each cylinder so the EEC could increase the fuel pressure accordingly. Of course, nitrous pressure is not constant while you are spraying(dropping while the nitrous oxide content getting lower also). Which means you will need extensive tuning to prevent you from going lean.
To my knowledge, the single entry dry kit for 99+ returnless fuel mustangs solves that problem by spraying in front of the MAF and tricks the EEC to spikes the fuel pressure. I am sure the same thing could be done in the CSVT.
Now here is my question, why would you want to run the dry system? A wet system is much safer since you are not depending on the EEC to deliver the fuel for you. Plus, NOS already makes the components for the returnless fuel system. Nitrous will spray right next to the fuel injectors(a special fitting goes in after the fuel rail) so you don't have to worry about puddling. Wouldn't that be easier??
|
|
|
|
|
|